Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[sm0ky2]

@ Sadang

right series of discussions, but it was after we got bored with the "linear gates", we started assembling the magnets into spinners of all sorts. That is when the effect was discovered by one of the members here.

I lost my lab, so im having to re-gather supplies and whatnot.
My cubes should be here tomorrow, and i'll try to produce something I can share with the class...
If that doesn't work, i'll pick up a can of the Magnetix toys and figure out how we built the original thingy...



@  TA

sorry, didn't mean to set off your psychosis......

That was just my description of the observable effects using the commonly accepted terminology for the experience....

When I refer to "magnetism", what I mean is the effect contained within and around the magnet, or electromagnet, inductor, conductor, ferromagnetic material, or sometimes radiated from other etherical events.

The term "Magnet" is the object that permanently contains the effect. ( or produces it atomically, depending on your perspective)
The usage of those terms the way I did in the discussion, was to distinguish the linear projection of the effect, from the magnet itself. because at that point in space, it was WELL BEYOND the (effective) field domains of the magnets, and it's behavior is not in accordance with the normal magnetic experience.

The "poles" referred to North and South labeling of the magnets. This is a necessary convention, regardless of the theory being discussed... Indismissably, There are equal and opposite experiences between the two polarities, and knowing which one we are dealing with can help.


By the way, the pyramid magnet is real close to the arrangement that produces the effect I was trying to explain.
   If you add a cylindrical magnet to the tip of the pyramid, it just might produce the long range effect.

[harhaoppisesti]

    "Sorry, didn't mean to set off your psychosis"
   That's got to be the best quote from the whole 230 odd pages!!
                        H.

[MileHigh]

You simply did not question the results of your own experiments.  That happens all the time
around here.  There is no chance at all that you observed what you are stating.  The experiment was
years ago, so I assume that you can't repeat it now.

Is anybody home?  This whole recent discussion has been a farce.

Kenny, can you please resume resizing your images and work with the collective whole on this forum?
Can you demonstrate mutual respect and cooperation with the people on this forum at least when
it comes to resizing your images before you upload them?

[wattsup]

Kenny, can you please resume resizing your images and work with the collective whole on this forum?
Can you demonstrate mutual respect and cooperation with the people on this forum at least when
it comes to resizing your images before you upload them?

@MH

That would require a brain set at human mode and not vortexian mode.

Actually, it's not his fault because the images he posts are of the right normal size but once they arrive on the
thread they get boosted by the vortexian counterspacial angular expansionist effect that all images
have when they have been adorned with @TAsian constructs. To simplify the explanation - they're over-bloated. hahaha

@all

Four simple questions.............

Question 1: If this is a magnetic vortex effect and since vortexes in this universe are know to be spinning entities,
what is the rpm of this magnetic vortex and do all magnets have the same rpm?

Question 2: If you rotate a bicycle wheel, at what rpm will the human eye stop being able to see the spokes turning
and only see a blur?

Question 3: Did @TA see the hypotrochoid with his own eyes or was it only visible with a fast action camera?

Question 4: If the magnetic vortex is strong enough to make physical ferrofluid shapes or manipulate physical
magnet paper atoms to physically align and produce those effects, why is it not strong enough to produce the real
anticipated result of such a spinning force and that is, it should only produce a blur if the force is a dynamic vortex
versus a static central force?

Before, or, in case @TA tries to answer any of these, let me first open the OU.com Virtual Toilet because we all know
@TA has a major problem with Verbal Incontinence. UV lights on, turbo-fan on, toilet seat down, seat belt
anchored, ready for discharge. hohoho

wattsup

[profitis]

Interesting questions @wattsup.what would possibly be the frequency of such a vortex if it exists.the FREQUENCY.the FREQUENCY.this all-important aspect has been neglected all through entire thread.why has it been neglected I ask myself.why.why.