Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

Smoky2:'a FerroCell, is essentially a "metamaterial" with a refraction index and polarization effect.

They can isolate specific frequencies of light and polarize it in such a manner that
 it becomes susceptible to a magnetic field influence. Which will alter the vector or angle, according to polarity and field intensity.'

Is the light itself bending in the magnetic field AFTER polarization or is the magnetic field bending the polarizer and not the light

[sadang]

We don't need to research the lenz-law.we need to RULE OUT the lenz law otherwise nothing happens

Not we but only you! In this discussion with me you have to rule out this law, not me. I'm not even bother to try this, because this trying is a fallacy of reasoning. The Lenz law can't be ruled out, until you change the way of thinking. And to change the way of thinking you have to research the history of this law. At least!

Pay attention to this image, maybe will learn something from it! The same situation with all humankind's laws. Only a way to shape the world! From many, many others!

---#---

if you can get through the senseless ranting, psychobabble, and general degradation of intelligences beyond his own, and get down to the core data of his theories.....

For me it not looks so rambling at all. Yes indeed, there are different aspects that I don't agree 100%, or others that are still understandable for me, but in general he has much more right than many science book about electromagnetism. And his not the only one, there are many others over time that emphasized the wrong path of current so called "science", and in general of the current human society with all of its!

Now, you bring in this discussion the argument of math, but according to my experience math can be used to prove any kind of theory, regardless of the premises who developed it. Thus, the math argument is behind that of the premises. If the premises are wrong, the entire further development is wrong, irrespective of what method are used to check the correctness of that premise.

Dielectric and diamagnetic parts, electric and magnetic counterparts. They are all the same and only thing; that is, ether in its infinite and ever dynamics. Or if you can define the main important word in this paragraph "electric", as deep as you can without fallacies of thinking and interpretation, I'll give you a sound Evrika!

You talk about the experiments of Ken's and the magnetic shape achieved during these experiments as "relativistic spatial distorsion"! Could you define the word "space" as deep as you can following the same cursive flow of thinking as I asked for in the previous paragraph?

[sm0ky2]

Is the light itself bending in the magnetic field AFTER polarization or is the magnetic field bending the polarizer and not the light

This was ruled out early on in the field of transformation optics.

It is actually the light of specific frequencies that is "bending" or being redirected across the magnetic gradient, as a byproduct of polarization.

[sm0ky2]

@Sadang

"space" to me, means simply a reference to the physical dimensions through which eather permeates.
Which varies over a given volume, by Time, mass, velocity, gravity.....

This is generally defined as the Hamiltonian space, or its' equivalents. Canonical coordinates from a given perspective reference.

[profitis]

Sadang:'In this discussion with me you have to rule out this law, not me.'

Excuse me?

Sadang:' The Lenz law can't be ruled out'

Then we are stuck with what the textbooks say about it and we don't grow any wiser.OR we continue getting raped by apophasis.