Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

Smoky2:'It is actually the light of specific frequencies that is "bending" or being redirected across the magnetic gradient, as a byproduct of polarization.'


Just checked it out myself now.we are stuck with the same problem.the magnetic field is influencing ferromagnetic domains in the polarizer slits and not influencing the light itself.back to square 1.this 'ferrocell' principal is not much different to colloidal suspentions of Fe2O3

[sm0ky2]

Smoky2:'It is actually the light of specific frequencies that is "bending" or being redirected across the magnetic gradient, as a byproduct of polarization.'


Just checked it out myself now.we are stuck with the same problem.the magnetic field is influencing ferromagnetic domains in the polarizer slits and not influencing the light itself.back to square 1.this 'ferrocell' principal is not much different to colloidal suspentions of Fe2O3

You are right, I was mistaken on this point.
It seems that the "bending" of light occurs within the refractive index inside the material. This is what changes with the magnetism

[profitis]

 we're chasing our own tails over this 'vortex' @smoky

[sm0ky2]

we're chasing our own tails over this 'vortex' @smoky

Maybe that's the key to watching it 'spin' ?

[sadang]

@Sadang

"space" to me, means simply a reference to the physical dimensions through which eather permeates.
Which varies over a given volume, by Time, mass, velocity, gravity.....

This is generally defined as the Hamiltonian space, or its' equivalents. Canonical coordinates from a given perspective reference.

It's ok again, nothing is static, everything is in a specific ever dynamics. Just it don't fit entirely in my current view of things. Let me develop a bit this subject. If science clearly proved the atom is something empty, the nucleus is also something empty, how can I define a volume in this complete emptiness? A volume of what in what? And defined by what? An emptiness defined by another emptiness (which I attribute physical proprieties) and which float in another emptiness? Are there more types of emptiness? Even the concept of emptiness loose its meaning in this context. So, what is space in this context, more than a mental concept? If you agree ether permeates all things, don't think you should first define that things that the ether permeates, their origin and subsequent development?

Perhaps you will argue with the existence of different fields, or with the wave-particle duality, but obliviously my next question will be to define the fields, waves and so on! And the discussion will arrive finally again to ether. Now, I dare to ask you, what is the meaning of words as space, volume, time, mass, gravity, velocity... beyond the mental concept? What is the valence of a Hamiltonian, Euclidean, Lagrangian or other human mental constructs to define the concept of space?

So, if there is no space apart form that defined by the human brain, why it is still used in the process of thinking, and further in the process of manipulating and shaping the reality? Why not simply come back to ether and reshape the way of thinking on this path? Or to change the thinking parading to an ever manifesting ether from which we are part of, and which we shape it mentally sec by sec? Are there some risks, or it means too much?