Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

Raz:'Can you share with  us what you found in your experiments regarding atomic h2? Any resemblance to what Lyne found ?'

Sure,just go to the 'karpen pile' thread under 2nd law violations bro.I made history there,mainly with atomic oxygen.you must get a firm grasp on the 2nd law thermodynamics in order to fully understand what 'ether' really is.

[profitis]

Apophasis has a good thing going with reducing all matter and waves to a common entity but then falls short on definitely proving(against all criticism) this 'moving vortexial' in all magnets.this is just my opinion ofcourse but I think a reasonable one

[Raz]

When the last creationist, homeopath or astrologer dies I'm sure the words on their lips will be something like: "You only think it's wrong because you don't understand."  See if you actually had even a microscopic amount of credit to your ideas we would be hearing your argument.  Instead you hide behind the idea that we can't prove that you don't have an argument.

See the difference?
....or he said some stupid moronic things.  If someone needs to resort to mysticism to communicate their ideas they are effectively asking YOU to do the hard part of making their argument.  Anyone who does that is of questionable value to science - except perhaps by accident or counter-example.

Again Trollie: I have never claimed anything of my own doing. You are the one insulting one of the greatest minds ever (Walter Russell) who actually had discoveries in science and accomplishments in art. What do you have to prove or say? Nothing,.just blah blah blah  opinions and silliness. Science already recognized what he did. You in the other hand are just a blind repeater. So I will ignore you as part of the troll list.

[Raz]

Apophasis has a good thing going with reducing all matter and waves to a common entity but then falls short on definitely proving(against all criticism) this 'moving vortexial' in all magnets.this is just my opinion ofcourse but I think a reasonable one

I think that proving something against all criticism is an impossible feat for anyone. There is always going to be detractors even if you give proof. You have to decide for your own practical applications that if a good idea comes along, and you can somehow use it to get a result ,then you should do it. Many inventions have been done before having all the theory worked out in the past. It happens many times  that after something that have been observed, that people start working theories around what is actually happening. In that I concur with Mr Russell that many things we observe are illusions of the real workings. What Mr Wheeler explains in his book far exceeds many of the tried explanations I have seen about the topic. Now , how about we try to design more experiments around  that magnetic vortex instead of bringing "modern theory" to try to contradict his explanation? I am still waiting for someone to answer or give an opinion about Dr. Meyl work, but it seems everyone is ignoring it. It have to do with the ether and vortices and an experiment proving the scalar waves that can be reproduced, but no one comments about it.

[profitis]

Raz:'I think that proving something against all criticism is an impossible feat for anyone. There is always going to be detractors even if you give proof'

I don't think its impossible for example if mr apophasis were to do an experiment and devote an entire thread to it and adjust it to combat criticism then I think he would have far far greater impact on and support from all sectors of the viewers.the criticism would grow proportionately sure but by the time it is clearcut,withstands all reasonable critics and repeatable by anyone then the die is cast and his theory stands tall.when it becomes obvious that criticism is weak,that's when the turningpoint comes