Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

Sarkeizen:' Don't try and argue semantics.'

Lol you do it all the time with your demands for assumption-status.part 1 is deduced from textbooks and part 2 is deduced from logic.whatever my clause IS it STILL stands unmolested dude

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on March 30, 2015, 01:21:45 PM
Sarkeizen:' Don't try and argue semantics.'

Lol you do it all the time with your demands for assumption-status.
That's not what people mean by "arguing semantics".   Sorry you lose again. :)

So since you disagree on the standard usage of English terms.  We will introduce new ones.  Ok? :)

profitis

Sarkeizen:'English terms.'

Hey your the one who doesn't believe in such a thing as an argumentative claim.ofcourse the fact that it goes against established physics doesn't make it de facto argumentative in the first place right? Lose the english rules mr sarkeizen and start tackling the science ARGUMENTS.my clause still stands high and mighty son until you or anyone else destroys it on ITS own terms 

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on March 30, 2015, 01:53:42 PM
Sarkeizen:'English terms.'

Hey your the one who doesn't believe in such a thing as an argumentative claim.
Yawn.  More semantics.  Easily defeated. :)

Since we can not agree on common usage.  I'm going to introduce some new terminology ok?

profitis

Sarkeizen:'i'm going to introduce some new terminology ok?'

Drumrolllll..prrrrrrr..humour me,go for it :)