Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Have you ever wondered about the particles that move through a light beam? Why ARE THEY NOT EFFECTED BY THE LIGHT BEAM? Why others are?

there are no particles IN light.



The concept of the "PHOTON" is an ARBITRARY BRAIN FART created by Atomistic assholes.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Light travels in packets, or Quanta, hence the term Quantum Physic

Light doesnt even travel AT ALL


There is NO SUCH BS as a "packet", rather a TRIFOLD circuit of dielectricity, and transversing Electricity and Magnetism



Its like saying "LIGHT IS A PAIR OF PISTONS IN A CAR ENGINE...."   

*********  well MOTHERFUCKERS, YOU LEFT OUT AND FORGOT ABOUT THE GODDAMN AXLE/ DRIVE SHAFT.   



its an Ether perturbation at which and by which dielectric pulses concordant to frequency produce transverse EM reciprocations.


These reciprocations are incoherent, coherent, circular, linear etc etc.



The idiot Einstein said: "We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately (particle and wave theory) neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do." The 'photon' is a purely arbitrary concept. Einstein wrongly concluded light was a discrete wave-packet.


He called such a wave-packet a 'light quanta'. Light, in fact, is D.E.M (dielectroelectromagnetic), a tri-fold circuit. The fundamental mass particle itself being a dielectric accretion formed in galactic formations, it is no coincidence whatsoever that light, like an atom itself, has dualistic properties of both waves and a beam of elements.




TRANSVERSE ELECTROMAGNETISM IS THE NOT THE SUBJECT (= I.E. LIGHT ITSELF), RATHER THE EFFECT.



By the insane logic of QUANTUM assholes, a Bicycle wheel AXLE (the light) is moving.



But no, idiots, its the reciprocating FELLY that is moving, ..... not the AXLE/HUB (the light itself)

[joel321]

there are no particles IN light.

The concept of the "PHOTON" is an ARBITRARY BRAIN FART created by Atomistic assholes.

In my mind I see a "leader" ("DNA") in light. Sort of like a nazi DNA light code. There is 'DNA' light frequency that vibrating surrounding particles make light. These subatomic particles remain 'loyal' to the entity and the frequency. As a matter of fact now I see light as not light but a frequency. Light has sub-atomic frequency sub-atomic molecular dancers that dance at the same dance step.

If I see the whole universe as DOTS all align to their own frequency, I see a 'PHOTON' align to the light 'leader' = DNA of light code! Light has to have "followers" that follow it to make it light. JUST AS MAGNETISM HAS TO HAVE "PARTICLES" TO MAKE MAGNETISM.

One sum-atomic particle does not make light. One sub-atomic particles does not make magnetism. It is the collection of sub-atomic particles DNA (frequency) that determine light or magnetism.

For this same reason ALL HUMANS CANNOT SEE OUTSIDE THE UNIVERSE where there could be frequencies that the eye nor the ears frequencies can detect. = dark matter!

In my mind, all I see is frequencies. Light frequencies at a certain channel and so as magnetism. Life is not all about magnetism nor light. LIFE IS ABOUT BOTH MAGNETISM AND LIGHT TOGETHER>!

I'm not sure why people go against you TA. Most likely, the confused people are. Magnetic principal mother nature ways are far from being understood in the year 2015 by the so called 'experts' that are the 'smartest' peaople in the world due to peer reviewing them?lol.

[Pirate88179]

In my mind I see a "leader" ("DNA") in light. Sort of like a nazi DNA light code. There is 'DNA' light frequency that vibrating surrounding particles make light. These subatomic particles remain 'loyal' to the entity and the frequency. As a matter of fact now I see light as not light but a frequency. Light has sub-atomic frequency sub-atomic molecular dancers that dance at the same dance step.

If I see the whole universe as DOTS all align to their own frequency, I see a 'PHOTON' align to the light 'leader' = DNA of light code! Light has to have "followers" that follow it to make it light. JUST AS MAGNETISM HAS TO HAVE "PARTICLES" TO MAKE MAGNETISM.

One sum-atomic particle does not make light. One sub-atomic particles does not make magnetism. It is the collection of sub-atomic particles DNA (frequency) that determine light or magnetism.

For this same reason ALL HUMANS CANNOT SEE OUTSIDE THE UNIVERSE where there could be frequencies that the eye nor the ears frequencies can detect. = dark matter!

In my mind, all I see is frequencies. Light frequencies at a certain channel and so as magnetism. Life is not all about magnetism nor light. LIFE IS ABOUT BOTH MAGNETISM AND LIGHT TOGETHER>!

I'm not sure why people go against you TA. Most likely, the confused people are. Magnetic principal mother nature ways are far from being understood in the year 2015 by the so called 'experts' that are the 'smartest' peaople in the world due to peer reviewing them?lol.

Kids, this is exactly why you should not do drugs.
Let the above post be a lesson for you.  This is what can happen.

Bill

[Theoretical Research]

Light doesnt even travel AT ALL


There is NO SUCH BS as a "packet", rather a TRIFOLD circuit of dielectricity, and transversing Electricity and Magnetism



Its like saying "LIGHT IS A PAIR OF PISTONS IN A CAR ENGINE...."   

*********  well MOTHERFUCKERS, YOU LEFT OUT AND FORGOT ABOUT THE GODDAMN AXLE/ DRIVE SHAFT.   



its an Ether perturbation at which and by which dielectric pulses concordant to frequency produce transverse EM reciprocations.


These reciprocations are incoherent, coherent, circular, linear etc etc.



The idiot Einstein said: "We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately (particle and wave theory) neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do." The 'photon' is a purely arbitrary concept. Einstein wrongly concluded light was a discrete wave-packet.


He called such a wave-packet a 'light quanta'. Light, in fact, is D.E.M (dielectroelectromagnetic), a tri-fold circuit. The fundamental mass particle itself being a dielectric accretion formed in galactic formations, it is no coincidence whatsoever that light, like an atom itself, has dualistic properties of both waves and a beam of elements.




TRANSVERSE ELECTROMAGNETISM IS THE NOT THE SUBJECT (= I.E. LIGHT ITSELF), RATHER THE EFFECT.



By the insane logic of QUANTUM assholes, a Bicycle wheel AXLE (the light) is moving.



But no, idiots, its the reciprocating FELLY that is moving, ..... not the AXLE/HUB (the light itself)

What you say is interesting. I made a post in the news section outlining some of my work if you're interested. I agree there's something wrong with the present standard model of light. That's why I'm now doing an experiment I've dreamt of for years. To see if the Quantum Mechanics equations of the photon is correct at radio frequencies, E = h*f. It's not easy at room temperatures, but I have design that will work. Basically the present design consists of a 49MHz source connected to a small loop antenna and a resistor of sufficient resistance to keep thermal noise current low enough to prevent it from bringing the source current high enough to emit a "photon." About 6 to 10 feet away is a large receiving loop antenna. Given the antennas radiation resistance, simple Quantum Mechanics equations show how much current is required to emit a photon at a given frequency per wavelength. So I'll keep decreasing the current while watching the receiver. If Quantum Mechanics single photons exist, then at the predicted threshold the receiving antenna will stop receiving the signal. The receiving antenna has a low noise high gain amp, which is connected to an oscilloscope. I've written custom software for my oscilloscope to allow it to do extensive spectral averaging. This is going to be interesting. Years ago I used to think the radio antenna could emit electromagnetic waves far below one photon per wavelength, but now I'm thinking that's not true. We'll see. If you have any design concerns for this experiment, then let me know. I've spent a lot of time thinking of holes in the experiment and then redesigning it. For example, it occurred to me that thermal noise current could aid the source in obtaining the emission threshold. That was solved by placing a resistor of sufficient resistance to bring down noise current, sqrt(4*k*T*B/R). The issue prior to that was that at sub-photon energies, the electromagnetic energy near field would not emit, but would collapse, expand, collapse, expand, building up with each wave until it finally reached the minimum level to emit. That was also solved by using high resistance to make the circuit resistive.

What's your explanation for the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment? I have some serious issues with Quantum Mechanics idea of entangled particles. I've written software that goes over a Bell's test experiment. It's actually extremely simple. It uses a classical mechanics approach. Not Quantum Mechanics. But yet it gets the exact same results as predicted by Quantum Mechanics. I spent way too much time arguing with academic scientists over this. Not a single one could find error in my math. One person challenged my math, offering alternative math, but I found his error. Then the admins got pissed and defensive. Nearly everyone ignored my math and focused on the Bell's theorem, which is pointless as far as I'm concerned. I conclude that Bell's test experiment does not prove there's anything spooky with entangled particles. Recently I began focusing on the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. That proved very difficult to explain by any valid theory. It's just filled with contradictory crap. I'll spare you details on that, but I have numerous serious issues with those experiments, and theories to explain the experimental errors they're making. Interestingly enough over the past 33 years worldwide there have been very few published delayed choice quantum eraser experiments. Strange, considering that it's thought to be the most important experiment in all history. I think most scientists are honest. Maybe they're seeing bad results that require serious tweaking to get good results. I'm not saying entanglement doesn't exist. Just that every entangled experiment I've studied thus far can be explained with classical mechanics. Quantum Mechanics claims there's an instant connection between entangled particles. Nobody has been able to get faster than light using entanglement. So they say it's impossible even though a lot of academics are still trying to find ways.  What are your thoughts?

Are you doing any experiments for your theories or have plans? Maybe we should periodically exchange emails.