Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[CycleGuy]

You can never change the laws of physics ! This Japanese fruit cake is doing his disclosure the wrong way round ! The correct way is to demo the sample at room temperature with out magnetism that add the magnetism than bring down the temperature than increase the temperature.  The obvious error is made by intent to pull the wool over your eyes ! When he does a visual on the sample at a higher temperature there is no decrease in the number of bubbles hahahahh check mate .... hahahaha

Also there is no spin so a vortex with no spin is not a vortex .. Static charged bubbles is what he has got and that means his stupid 1 million volt microscope is interfering with the sample hahahahahhahahahah in other words its a heap of junk ! Also the daft claim that its the first time an atom can be seen is a lie as there is now very good pictures made of the proton surface ...

These so called scientist's who in the video were claimed to confirm it all work for the company and none are particle physicists or quantum mechanics so no independent study is made or confirmed .  His electron propagation tech is shit and the daft claim that he can send an electron through an eye of a needle at 50 miles away is bonkers ....... So the man is bonkers ! He designed a heap of junk found loads of bubbles and used it as a lie to cover up his error !

Stop believing in YouTube and stick to the real laws that govern such things ! It would not surprise me if his mad idea to make a smart phone that can view a 3D image of an atom will suck up some more money as its obvious that the directors of the company are as thick as 2 planks of wood ! When you see people doing things the wrong way round and present them as real with no out side independent conformation don't trust it ............

I am thinking of writing to the company director with these facts and may seek legal compensation for wasting my time and adding in other claims that will completely destroy this nut job .......... They will not like what we have to say about it ! And if they let us take a re take I think you should go there and do it !!! hahahahhahahahahahahah bonkers its all bonkers .....

If you're not going to contribute to the discussion by sticking to reality, then why do you bother?

He didn't say he could shoot an electron through the eye of a needle at 50 miles, he was analogizing the accuracy of the electron holography microscope used to image the magnetic vortexes. And you're still forgetting the side-shots of the vortexes, in real-time, showing them rotating... because the ultra-low temperatures and fast scanning speed allowed a small enough "time-slice" that we could see it. And you forget the two mathematical proofs provided, completely in accordance with QM.

"air bubbles"... in an ultra-high vacuum. 

I have had the good experience of being within 500 ft of 6 UFOS and not magnetic fields were being used !
 

  Flying saucers are very important and work best as a magnetic vortex so they have a direct role in this thread !
 

You do not represent scientific inquiry, you represent its polar opposite. Your writing whatever comes to mind, no matter how nonsensical, no matter if it contradicts what you've stated prior, is doing a great disservice to scientific inquiry in that there are those who would believe outright your meanderings, and it necessitates everyone having to wade through and vet your statements. You are not, sir, contributing to scientific inquiry, you are contributing to a form of scientific chaos in which psychiatric infirmity and nonsensical beliefs invade upon truth.

So, we're done here. You're on "ignore" status from now on.

[minnie]

  Atom,your language gets more reminiscent of Kelly every day!
   Don't kill off the debate, I'm enjoying it,
           John.

[citfta]

I don't understand why you guys are even arguing about this.  Dufo has already picked up the banner and is shouting from the rooftops that this theory is correct.  Surely no one has any doubts about this if Dufo is for it.  I mean after all he is the master of deception and misinformation.  I really had no interest in this topic at all until I saw where Dufo started posting about it.  Then I realized it was probably another snow job to get people to argue instead of concentrating on trying to find some real solutions.  From the little I have read about this theory it does make any difference at all.  Only real testing and working with magnets will teach you anything.  There is nothing to be gained from reading another pie in the sky wild theory.

Just my opinion and I don't really care whether you agree or not.

Carroll

[minnie]

   This is for Joel,
                         this fellow Perelman came up with a solution for
Poincare's conjecture. There was a medal and a million dollar prize.
He didn't collect either.Great man!
            John.

[CycleGuy]

The easiest way of proving or disproving Mr. Wheeler's hypothesis that a magnet is "dielectric" and is throwing off / taking in "inertial dielectricity" is to devise an experiment such that these charged particles (because remember, he says a magnet gives off "inertial dielectricity", while he's redefined "inertial" to mean "the opposite of rest" and "dielectricity" to mean "static electricity"... so "static electricity in motion") are put through a dielectric such that they give off Cherenkov radiation.

If Mr. Wheeler is able to produce Cherenkov radiation from a magnet, it would be an absolute confirmation of his theory. If he is unable to do so, that nullus resultarum will stand as an absolute refutation of  his theory.

Will Mr. Wheeler take the challenge to validate his theory?