Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[conradelektro]

However Neil, Kely, Peter, Tom and others including me here, just say the stars can not be seen in the outer space by human eyes not by its technological extensions.

Let's just believe for a moment what the great Lindeman says about light. Even if that is true, one sees the starts in space because the lens in our eyes "difracts" the light. Or the screen of a space helmet or the lens in a camera. Or the water in the retina cells if you want to go as far as the retina. Or the molecules on the film or in a charged coupled device (electronic camera).

So, for me, this theory is not consistent. But you may believe it, if that pleases you. It is a rather harmless believe. It would be much more dangerous if you believed that you can fly if you stepped off a high roof.

The real philosophical and biological question is, what the brain or the mind makes out of the electrical impulses coming from the retina. The "image" you "see" in your mind is the thing you have to wonder about. What ever you see, whatever you hear and whatever you sense, taste and feel is interpreted by your mind. And how accurate is this interpretation? It must be pretty accurate, because many people survive until they are very old. And most people manage the daily chores without problems.

So, your mind might distort the sensory input to your brain or mind, but the distortion does not prohibit a successful life. I conclude from that: whatever distortion or interpretation happens, it is not bad or counter productive. It must be a pretty good interpretation of reality or all would die after a few days of misinterpreting the world around us.

Well, there are people who misinterpret reality. If they do not die, some get medication, some end up in a mental hospital and quite a lot show up in this forum.

Greetings, Conrad

[sadang]

Let's just believe what Neil Amstrong said about stars. I'm sure you don't have other arguments than theoretic ones, while he say about what he saw not what he suppose it can be seen in the outer space. Try to explain him about how his eyes work and expose your arguments maybe he will retreat what he said then and is now publicly available.

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtdcdxvNI1o&t=17

And let me subscribe 100% to your last sentence.

Sincerely,
SaDAng

[conradelektro]

Let's just believe what Neil Amstrong said about stars.

May be it is just urban legend or a misinterpretation of his words or just a lie or Neil Amstrong was not really in his best health when he said that.

So many possibilities and rather shaky reports. We will not clarify that in this forum. Neil Amstrong died in 2012, so we can not ask him any more.

There are a huge number of reports that stars (light) can be seen in space. One can always claim that all these reports are lies. But it is very unlikely. Why would anyone want to uphold such a lie? What would be the purpose of it?

But I will never convince you, so I stop.

Greetings, Conrad

[conradelektro]

.................................................. I am very good at this so don't challenge me !!!

Wow! Great! This demonstration of a disturbed mind is really something. I must be art, or help is needed urgently.

Nobody can challenge that, it explains itself. It is proof! At last, we have proof!

Greetings, Conrad

[sadang]

I understand you, so I'll don't push things beyond the limits of common sense. Is your right to not believe Neil but in the same time you have the same right to study deep this aspect. Think who founded the nasa spatial program, why and in what conditions. Think about the subtext, text and context if you really want to understand a thing.

In a completely corrupt society is not a sign of wisdom to be well framed in it.

SaDAng