Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[CycleGuy]

ok well, im gonna say a couple things here,.
First:  that guy's interpretation of the physics he's attempting to describe is unfounded in reality.....

However, most of what he is saying does hold a degree of truth in it.
I'll even go as far as saying that the dates and times of these galactic events (as I like to call them), are engraved in the stones of our ancestors, thousands of years ago.
knowledge we are just now re-learning.

not only solar flares, but entire energy convergences of the bodies orbiting within our galaxy.
all pointing towards the galactic center, and each along their own plane of rotation.
each solar system, or gravitationally interacting bodies within our galaxy, spins on its' axis on a specific plane.
the gravitational and magnetic moments are perpendicular to this plane of rotation.
and cyclically, like clockwork, these planes all point towards the galactic center at certain intervals.

https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-the-great-pyramid-of-giza-and-the-speed-of-light.t2154/
Did the builders of the pyramids use the metric system? No. They used cubits (a rather arbitrary measurement system based upon the length from the tip of the middle finger to the bottom of the elbow). So the conflation of:
Speed of light through vacuum (299,792,458 m/s)
A geographic coordinate of 29.9792458 for the Great Pyramid
is just a coincidence. In fact, it's a coincidence that relies upon jiggering the numbers to even make it work. You might as well say a man's forearm and hand length is somehow related to the speed of light. It's nonsensical in the extreme.

Are there "500,000,000 neutrinos per photon" in a hydrogen fusion reaction, as Mr. Richardson claims? No, the process consumes two neutrinos in Stage 1, produces two neutrinos in Stage 2, and produces two neutrinos in Stage 3, for a net of 2 neutrinos per nuclear reaction. If he can't understand something as simple as this, he has little hope of figuring much else out.

Is it possible to predict solar flares? Yes, by as much as 2 to 3 days, by watching for a surface manifestation of interior magnetic flux twisting. NOAA scientists discovered the phenomenon that leads to more accurate solar flare prediction in 2010. It has to do with a shift in the wavelength of light being emitted in the vicinity of those intense magnetic fields.

Are there 6 hydrogen atoms involved in fusing hydrogen to helium? Yes, but only if you discount the end product of 1 helium and 2 hydrogen. Net, it's 4 hydrogen that transmute into 1 helium.

Does a nonary (base-9) numerological system and new math have anything to do with the universe? No, especially the way Mr. Richardson is doing the math. I'd invite him to study ternary mathematics. He's edging dangerously close in his claiming special importance of the numbers 9 and 11 to subscribing to the nonsensical numerological conspiracy that the FreeMasons were behind the 9/11 attacks.

Are solar flares or coronal mass ejections manifesting on a regular basis, pointed directly at the black hole in the center of our galaxy? Absolutely not. Solar flares and coronal mass ejections do not occur on a timed schedule, although the level of activity does rise and fall on a pseudo-regular approximately 11 year basis called the Schwabe cycle, which has to do with uneven rotation of the plasma in the sun (the equator rotates faster than the poles) causing magnetic flux lines to bunch up over time. Those flux lines breaking and breaching the photosphere cause sunspots, and in severe instances, CMEs. Note the individual sunspots or CMEs are not on a "schedule", but the Schwabe cycle is roughly 11 years.

Does the diameter of the sun in miles somehow equate to the number of seconds in a day? Do you think the sun cares that we use essentially arbitrary measurements called "mile" and "second"? And which "mile" should be used? Talmudic, Roman, Italian, Arabic, British, Irish, Welsh, Scottish, German, Danish, Hungarian, Scandinavian, Portuguese, Russian, Croatian, Metric, Geographical, German Geographical, International, US Survey, Nautical? They're all different, they're all arbitrary, originally based upon 1000 paces... you might as well say the length of a man's legs and therefore his stride length is somehow tied to the diameter of the sun. It's nonsensical in the extreme.

The second was derived as a result of dividing 1 by 24, then by 60, then dividing it by 60 again. And even then, we  have leap seconds and leap days, because our arbitrary time measurement system is inaccurate... there should have been 488 leap days added to the calendar since the Year 0, and that's in just the past 2015 years.

Mr. Richardson is looking at numerological coincidences and ascribing to them importance. And when he cannot get the results his skewed beliefs tell him he should get, he goes through the typical mental gymnastics such as failing to close out a base-9 mathematical equation (93 million miles = 9 + 3 = 12, instead of 93 million miles = 9 + 3 = 12 = 1 + 2 = 3, for instance), or reversing the numbers (27 doesn't work, so try 72).

And that brings up his use of rounded numbers as proxy for the actual numbers (93 million miles in lieu of the actual 92,955,807 miles distance between sun and Earth, for instance).

It's a mishmash of mental gymnastics that will amount to literally nothing but a huge time sink. The universe neither knows nor cares what measuring sticks we use, to include time and distance.

[MileHigh]

I think that there is an important message related to this debate.

If this forum is going to be "open minded" enough to let people post stuff that the vast majority of us would recognize as
simply completely ridiculous nonsense, then it also has to be open minded enough to let people state that it is completely
ridiculous nonsense.  In other words, it's a two-way street.

It's an even more important principle when what the person is promoting can be financially damaging or dangerous to
others if they were to undertake a nonsensical project.  There was a person promoting the B&L "energy from the ground"
pitch which involves spending a few thousand dollars on an inverter, batteries, grounding rods, and digging up your backyard.
That's a lot different than someone pitching a circuit that costs a few tens of dollars.

Here is a clip reminding all of us about the important principle of free speech and how you have to be prepared to
tolerate any "discomfort" associated with it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vVohGWhMWs

For example, this whole thread is basically junk, there is no magnetic vortex.  On the "Partnered Output Coils" thread there
isn't a single posting with any definitive proof that "partnered output coils" produce over unity.  In fact, just using
rational analysis of the proposed circuits clearly shows that there is zero chance of ever seeing over unity with that
coil configuration.  That's not going to stop people from promoting it.  Likewise, it's not going to stop people from saying
that the whole concept is nonsense.  Show us the data.

So, going into 2016, keep free speech in mind.  It's all about holding ourselves to being tolerant of differing views and also
asking for real data.  There are way too many threads where people are afraid to ask for tangible results with real data.  If
somebody posts what you believe to be valid, then great, support them but don't be afraid to ask for tangible results with
real data.  If somebody posts what you believe to be crap, state that without making an attack on the person.  If you
feel strongly enough, you can attack the proposition while backing up your statements with logic and reason.

Freedom to say what you want, and also being prepared to listen to criticism, are what makes a forum a forum.

What this forum really needs is a fascist daemon process running in the background automatically deleting posted images that
are wider than 900 pixels.  That's a fascism that I think we all would welcome.

MileHigh

[Acca]

And the Vasant Corporation is back. aerospace electronics engineer, George J. Bugh who is selling his book.. on spinwaves on ESR . link below... I have bought his book on amazon..
http://vasantcorporation.com/

George J. Bugh videos on spinwaves
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkOuGRU8akA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjsL1zfmKvA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=craHcstJJZ0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izlcZPUMkdA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDEtPGB13NM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEMFqOvViDg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge4Ni3ke2I8


http://overunity.com/13721/energy-from-the-ground-self-powered-generator-by-barbosa-and-leal/msg469797/#new

[CycleGuy]

What this forum really needs is a fascist daemon process running in the background automatically deleting posted images that
are wider than 900 pixels.  That's a fascism that I think we all would welcome.

MileHigh

I agree with your summary, on almost all counts except there being a magnetic vortex.  We're both right, from different viewpoints. From our timeframe, there is no vortex, but since magnetism stresses the QVZPE field density and thus affects time, the vortex is out of our time frame, which is why we don't experience it. Take a gander at a couple of my prior posts, showing the temporal vortex mathematically, as well as the Japanese researcher who used ultra-high vacuum, ultra-cold temperature and an ultra-high resolution scanning microscope to capture the vortex in real time.

As for the fascist daemon process, I've seen other forums which automatically reduced the display size of images to a set maximum, and you click on them to get the full size picture. That'd be a real boon to the forum, for sure.

[minnie]

   You look short today,yes but not in my frame of reference!!
         John.