Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Acca]

 
Atom ....




Remember what I told you that I know that you are right ...because you have said certain things that are significant.. Not here, NOT NOW !!!

I will say that Wesley is on the right track and don't make it an issue here.. Please...

Private post ONLY.. Nuts you are not... it was a distraction.. there are other people here who read this also ...

Look up my post on http://overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg471055/#new

Your quote:

"This is a very real danger ! Each proton is 1kw of pure energy and most of that energy is with the quarks ... There are billions and billions of them in a small amount of copper !"


Don't post  this stuff here... NOT in this public forum... 

Here is something you might consider as it fits you model .. mass acceleration .. LOOK very dangerous.. effect..

Ps it's not a simple vaporization !!

Cumulative Effect Yutkina hydrocannon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juvyhukMx4s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmpGL78TTs8

Кумулятивная гидропушка на эффекте Юткина

Acca..

[Acca]

Cycle ...

So does Ken have right to write a book on other peoples discoveries,  yes as all of previous foundations are built on other peoples works..

Sounds like you are jealous of his book ...

I got a copy of his book as he was giving it away.. and now it's for sale his efforts have to be validated as he did put work in to that ..

Wrong of right .. Who cares it's his time not yours..

I am here to learn and not to cry...

Criticism is good, however telling people to "prove their" work is crap as "they don't have to prove any thing to anyone" ..

and there are OLD TIMERS here on this forum(s) that squat and crap on people here because no one stands up to them...

LISTEN first, and then HELP these people who have less education and correct them.. DON'T KILL THEIR DRIVE !!!


Not everybody is the SAME as YOU !! We are all different...

Acca...

[sadang]

Thanks Acca, I've fixed that. It was not my intent to hurt his rights, and he know this very well.

Why are you afraid to posts things that are very well known to each who bent of this things. I suppose because you still think in a polarized way, and still believe there should be someone who control the others. Wrong my bro, wrong! Knowledge is universal, understanding is individual!

If proton has an energy of about 1Kw (in terms of electric energy) what is the total energy of an atom? On the other hand why we have to always consider only the interactions at the level of the electrons energies, when is relative easy to catch the energy of an entire atom? And I don't talk here in terms of its uncontrolled avalanche reaction, but in terms of a soft decay. Is plasma a shame or a forbidden subject? Of course not the current plasma joke but the plasma in its fundamental structure.

[Acca]

Here is some thing you might find interesting...


Method for efficiently converting electrical energy into energy of the plasma..
Nuclear power ...


If you add a copper powder to this water you will get X-rays and Beta(s)...


Here is some translated russinan patent info links follow ...

"This is ATOM dissociation of gas molecules in the plasma discharge"

this is what Russians say ... they are very good in plasma physics..

"Thus, even at currents on the order of less than 3-4, the conditions for a complete and deep until atoms dissociation of gas molecules in the plasma discharge, the potential of large stored energy, especially radicals (having energy at a temperature of 60000 K - 20 eV, much more energy heating the particles at the same temperature - 5.5 eV, and 0.7 eV at 8000 K); high concentration per unit volume of charged particles that provide high, despite a lot of pressure, conductivity. By reducing the current discharge plasma expands at supersonic speeds (initially at a rate of about 10,000 m / s)"

"High-energy charged particles (electrons, ions, radicals) is heated, ionize and dissociate the gas molecules, aided by light, ultraviolet and soft X-rays, as well as sound and supersonic shock waves (the shock-compressed gas molecules burst - dissociate, falling to low pressure behind the shock front, not withstanding sudden pressure drop). By reducing the pressure in the plasma conductivity increases. These factors slow down the speed of the fall of the conductivity with increasing plasma volume during the expansion. The volume of the resulting plasma is growing"



https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freepatent.ru%2Fpatents%2F2397625&edit-text=&act=url

http://www.freepatent.ru/patents/2397625

http://www.freepatent.ru/images/patents/65/2397625/patent-2397625.pdf



ps ... By Ramin Skibba | Stanford Engineering


Method for efficiently converting electrical energy into energy of the plasma.



https://engineering.stanford.edu/research-profile/plasma-experiments-bring-astrophysics-down-earth

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Toward this end they constructed a device the size of a mini-fridge. They used it to apply an electric field to a small amount of gas and to accelerate the gas's electrons through a rifle-like tube. These electrons crashed into neutral atoms, knocking still more electrons loose as the particles continue to gain energy, like a rolling snowball starting an avalanche. This process ionized the gas and produced a plasma.
A probe within the tube provided detailed observations to prove that the plasma exhibited two behaviors that scientists have long observed in combusting gases. These two behaviors are deflagration and detonation. A deflagration is gas that expands away from the burning site, such as thrust exiting a rocket engine. A detonation is a gas burning under pressure that creates a shock wave.

Stanford Plasma Gun during a single firing. The image shows where the plasma is brightest during the acceleration process, which occurs over tens of microseconds

[CycleGuy]

Cycle ...

So does Ken have right to write a book on other peoples discoveries,  yes as all of previous foundations are built on other peoples works..

Sounds like you are jealous of his book ...

Ken has a right to write whatever delusional blather he wishes, but when he starts selling it as a scientific tome purporting to unlock the secrets of a fundamental force of nature, especially given that his hobby theory would result in a universe that can be demonstrated could not exist, he'll be held accountable when people start giving his book bad reviews and demanding their money back... and it's a pretty sure bet Mr. Wheeler will instead refuse to refund, and will try to shout down those calling him on his BS, just as he's done on this forum... he can barely give the book away in intelligent circles, he can hardly expect it to sell well except to that crowd who wouldn't be able to understand it anyway... because if they understand it, they can refute it, as I've done in spades.

Jealous? Of a guy who's constructed a fantasy universe which could not exist, then attempted to shout down those telling him he's delusional? Hardly.

I got a copy of his book as he was giving it away.. and now it's for sale his efforts have to be validated as he did put work in to that ..

Wrong of right .. Who cares it's his time not yours..

It's also the time (and money, and effort) of all those who wade into the mishmash of repetitious disputatious pontification, attacks upon those who've done the heavy lifting in creating the mathematical framework for describing our universe, and little to no proofs that make up what Mr. Wheeler calls a book.

I am here to learn and not to cry...

Criticism is good, however telling people to "prove their" work is crap as "they don't have to prove any thing to anyone" ..

You've got that bass-ackwards. The person making the assertions must present proof, he shouldn't even have to be asked for it, let alone asked for it repeatedly. If he's selling a book that purports to uncover the "Secrets of Magnetism", then people deserve to get something for their money, something that's aligned with reality... unless you're now stating that Wheeler's book is a work of fiction, which would give him license to write whatever he wants without having to prove anything to anyone.

and there are OLD TIMERS here on this forum(s) that squat and crap on people here because no one stands up to them...

LISTEN first, and then HELP these people who have less education and correct them.. DON'T KILL THEIR DRIVE !!!

They're not "squatting and crapping" on people, they're trying to wake the person promulgating delusion to the fact that what they're promulgating cannot be reality. But then, you appear to be one of them who stubbornly refuses to wake up and take a look around at reality, choosing instead to remain in WheelerLand, where merely saying something makes it so, and no one has to back their assertions up with actual proof.

You are, after all, the one who so believes in Mr. Richardson's blather that you've told him to keep it a secret... I've seen his work, I done his "new math", I've uncovered his errors.

He's got nothing because one can't build working devices upon a foundation that isn't even closely aligned with reality. He'll never demonstrate any of his claimed devices because that would expose him as either delusional, a congenital liar, or a scammer. But according to you, that's fine... he "doesn't need to prove anything to anyone"... I'm sure you'll be sending him your life savings right away so he can build his devices, yes?

No? Why not? He's claimed to have all these devices, he's claimed they all work according to his "new math" base-9 two-page delusional unscientific blather... he's going to change the world! He's going to save the world! He's going to make you a ton of money! No need for him to prove anything, just drain your bank account, stuff all that money into a large manila envelope, forward it to him and wait for your windfall from the profits he'll make selling the world his amazing new gadgets.

Right? Put your money where your mouth is.

Not everybody is the SAME as YOU !! We are all different...

Acca...

Being "different" in no way negates the necessity of presenting proof of assertions... what you're essentially saying is "Not everybody needs to believe in reality, we can all believe differently." Reality neither knows nor cares whether you believe in it, reality will remain reality regardless... and your fictional reality of Wheelerism will not exist no matter how much you believe in it, because it does not reflect reality. You're making a religious argument in a scientific forum. You believe in Wheelerism in spite of proof to the contrary, you're running on faith alone and no proof of Wheelerism whatsoever.