Overunity electrolysis - 31 times more effective gas production than with DC

[MarkE]

MarkE,

As I told you before, you are NOT very good at this.....you should TRY to find a different occupation....!

More shrill, more ad hom.  It's boring.  It does not add to any scientific discussion.

Oh, so you are here to teach me about CDI, eh??

If you are familiar with CDI then you would know that contrary to your stated claim that it is limited to the input supply voltage, that it normally includes a boost voltage converter to charge the capacitor.  So were you uninformed, or being deliberately dishonest when you complained incorrectly that CDI is limited to the input supply voltage?

Perhaps you should have checked out my Water Fueled Generator Project (WFGP) before you shoot your big mouth off!

Most people on this Forum had enough of your ravings.

I have worked with "water fuel" for 20 years.
Perhaps you want to teach me about electrolysis, too??
How many electrolysers have you made?

If you are an expert at electrolysis then you should be able to deliver on your claims.

Unlike you, I have NO problem running engines on water.
But YOU have a problem explaining THAT away!

I rest my case.

Have a nice day.

Cheers,
Les Banki

So is that a big no go on producing the water powered cars?

[ARMCORTEX]

http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showthread.php?t=86492


I give my hydrogen circuits, perhaps it may be of some use.

[ltseung888]

 
I actually met and worked with the late Yull Brown in the 1980s.  One of the most interesting properties of the Browns Gas is IMPLOSION.[/font]



When I first got involved, I was worried about explosion as I knew that Hydrogen and Oxygen were used as fuel in rockets.  The hydrogen airships could explode.[/font]



Mr. Brown convinced me that his Browns Gas was harmless if handled properly.  One of the properties not well understood is implosion.  When a volume of Browns Gas is ignited, a partial vacuum will be created.  Dennis Lee used this feature to demonstrate the lifting of a weight in his Energy Conference.  This actually is a clear case demonstrating that Energy comes from outside.[/font]



The significance did not hit me until now – when the Indian Scientists and others successfully produced much more hydrogen via pulsing.



The attached slide comparing electrolysis and pulsing is significant.  Most people assume that the gas structures from electrolysis and from Pulsing or Browns Gas are identical.  That is a false assumption.[/font]



Please review and comment on the Slide (comment .  Browns Gas does have the property of implosion.  This implies energy can be brought-in from the environment.  Water can be used as fuel in a very funny way.  Some energy is used (pulsed in?) to change the water molecules into the Browns Gas structure (or some form different from normal hydrogen and oxygen gas form).  This new structure implodes or gets energy from outside to get back to normal water.[/font]



Divine Revelation?

[MarkE]

Your chart is incomplete.  The implosion is simply a result of energy in the surrounding gas volume acting on the volume reduction that results because at ordinary atmospheric pressure liquid water is much denser than the gaseous H₂ and O₂ reacted to make it.  You have not taken the energy in the local atmosphere into account.

[Bob Smith]

Lawrence,
I'd like to offer a thought for your consideration:

Instead of the term implosive, I believe we could also use the term centripetal or counter-spatial.
This centripetal/counter-spatial attribute is a key characteristic of the dielectric field in relation to permanent magnets, according to the emerging work of Ken Wheeler (user theoriaapophasis) on this forum.

I'd like to suggest that pulsation (as opposed to electrolysis) produces better gas production because it is tapping the dielectric field (aether), whose nature is counter-spatial (implosive).  The pulsing sets up a kind of imbalance between charge and discharge, which the dielectric rushes in to restore balance from its own vast and much more highly energetic universal reservoir - again, in a way that is counter-spatial/implosive.  In this same way then, Brown's gas is produced with its implosive properties.

If I may be so bold, I believe this same aether/dielectric inrushing dynamic might also may speak to your lead-out theory.

Respectfully,
Bob