Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram

[sm0ky2]

Here's a guy magnetizing gold, with the pmh loop
And an electric charge


Similar to my hand-held 'loop maker'
But with a much higher voltage
This guy uses a Ban De Graff to initiate the loop
through a steel plate
With 2 gold samples in the loop
https://youtu.be/zOLu6ftHtRY


Here we see the loop can be sustained without the keeper
by separating the residual-field into 2 components
Each acting as their own keeper, to the respective pole

[sm0ky2]

For those interested in the original source material
As I have said before, Ed was a fraud, and a scammer
He plagiarized the scientific work of others for his own
purposes, and to lure crowds to his castle.


https://www.jstor.org/stable/108001?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents


Many of his other experiments are found here as well.
In fact, the British Royal Society is the source of all of Ed's material
Including his "secret of the Egyptians", which he was not lying when he
said he left the secret by his moon fountain.
Just ask the Lit-Lik bird....
The secret is still there, in plain sight.

[sm0ky2]

I propose a test, to ascertain the existence of dark energy and dark matter.


Present in the PMH, and similar (natural) magnetic loops, found in astronomical sources.


This test shall be the careful and precise weighing of the PMH,
in both conditions (locked and unlocked)


If so determined, that there be a difference in discernible mass
This is to be considered the source of dark energy and dark matter.
Specifically in the form of stored magnetic energy.


This is decidedly the proposed test, based on information presented by
Mr. Watkins (inventor of the PMH), Michael Faraday, and Augustin-Jean Fresnel
And the energy to mass derivation presented by Albert Einstein.

[sm0ky2]

I planned to conduct this test, but I stopped myself


In theory, a sustained inductive effect should increase the internal energy
of the metal, thereby increasing its mass.
This is distinct from permanent magnetization, which does not change the mass.


However, a bit of preliminary math tells me that the difference in mass
would be something to the tune of 1 x 10^14 Joules per gram
so to have anything measurable, would take a LOT of energy
like a PMH the size of a house, and locked by the mains.


The problem then becomes the accuracy of scales that large,
and how to move the chunk of metal onto them.


there may be some middle ground, which could include as large of a PMH
as could be feasible, and a very very accurate scale.




Astronomical PMH loops could easily attain high energy levels
which would skew the equation into an appreciable value of 'magnetic mass'
The issue then becomes finding such a magnetic loop, in a region where
Dark Matter should exist.

[sm0ky2]

A little interesting observation I made
The magnitude depends a little on the core materials used
But I will describe the effect


Pre-note:
At this time I do not know the exact value of 'stored magnetism'
being lost here, as I don't currently have a tool to measure it.


When we saturate a core to be locked:
not all of the magnetism holds
The lock is actually sustained at a value less than saturation
(my best guess, deterministically, is ~60-75% retention +/-)


undoubtedly some function of H/a^2L
[edit: for clarity, the L used here is length/a, in whole number units]
[and a is (pi)(1/2 wire diameter)^2]







acting at the atomic level, to sustain the magnetic capacitance
for some reason, about a third of the magnetism leaks out
when we remove the locking field.
this can be picked up on the coils
(one of the determining indicators of the approximate value)


This is complicated by any excess electromagnetism from the coil field
as this too will leak back out when switched off
The exact rebound of the core-flux is most accurately observed when
the input is tuned very near the minimum to achieve full saturation


If this function can be identified, we will be very close to a mathematical
representation of the flux capacitor