Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram

[sm0ky2]

Repeatable experiment:


Place a resistance in series to the magnetic loop


Produced is heat (very small unless the device is large and magnetic strength high)
AND
a detectable magnetic field OUTSIDE of the PMH.

[sm0ky2]

Lining up an extensive series of experiments with PMH's
(Locked Loop, and without the keeper)


But before i begin, im reviewing my knowledge set
Re watching videos,
Going back through my discussions with David Lambright and his work
as well as my own previous experiments.
Cataloging the unknowns, clarifying questions that need answering before i begin.


First, does the strength of the applied field affect the strength of the loop?


To answer this i prepared 17 materials in 20 loops, mostly solid loops but a few were assemblies


And locked them under a range of (permanent) magnetic conditions
There are two cases:
One where the applied field induces less than saturation in the material


And the other is when the applied field saturates the material


Many tests were done, but for logging data 1/4" soft iron rod bent into a circle, ~ 6" diameter was used here. Gap distance ~ 1/8"


Unsaturated Condition: weaker magnetic fields produce a weaker lock
ranges of measurement (by breaking the keeper by adding g weights)
          0.5 - 3 g
Magnets used were rubber ferrite (frigerator magnets, magnetic strips etc)




Saturated Condition: no change in magnetic strength, 7g break point remained consistent
Magnets used: ceramic ferrite, cobalt, neos of various shapes and sizes


Conclusion: above the saturation point of the material, strength of the magnetic lock is determined by material properties alone.



A second question came up during these tests:
Concerning the length (and in some cases complexity) of the loops with respect to the inducing field.
It seems a small magnet can do big things. But this should be looked into


The primary question is, of course, what material, size of loop and resistance value(s) would be appropriate to begin tests of that nature?


is there any electric induction involved? Or is this a purely 'magnetic current'?
Unfortunately i have never came across the original British Royal Society publication that shows the scientific interpretation of this. So all i have to go on is what ed wrote and what can be observed. (If anyone has a link to that plz post below)


For the Lambright thermal emissions to occur, there must be a flow of energy through the resistive components. Why this doesnt weaken the magnetic lock is outside the scope of my knowledge.
Maybe this could be deciphered with careful application of a certain atomic constant, but thats for someone else to worry about.


at first i was just curious as to wether or not the magnetism would flow through the resistor to the opposite leg and back into the loop
but now that i know its related to David's research,
I'm wondering if his assemblies cause a form of resistance because of the way the field winds around


Ed wrote (and left evidence of) sending this down a wire.....
it goes down the resistor, thats basically already doing it
But how long can we make the circuit? Will the iron just keep magnetizing its neighbor infinitely as long as the loop is connected back to itself?


Or does it fade out at some distance or length of ferrous wire?


Iron wire and possibly some alternatives, but i think steel is off the table
I had some steel wire that stuck to a magnet, but didnt loop worth a squat
and maintained residual magnetism at spots not down the length
What material is best for this? Probably one that doesnt hold magnetism when the field goes away?


Can a magnetic circuit be made to do work?


These and other questions, i will experiment with and attempt to find some answers.

[sm0ky2]

Two areas of exploration may include:


Use of feedback mechanisms
to detect 'magnetic current'


and a path of curiosity:
when overlapping transparent images of 2 book covers as Ed. Hints to us
The device resembles a circuit shows in electrical diagrams of the Ankh / djed devices of Egypt
Wherein a lodestone was set to vibrate through 2 opposing coils to a spark-gap oscillator.
Same basic function we imagine from Tony Stark's arch reactor

[sm0ky2]

The electrical changes that would make to the PMH are as follows:


Instead of two coils, each of them is comprised of two coils.
As a transformer. Ed clearly shows these as current transformers
Meaning the secondary has less windings than the primary (voltage step down)


And these are wires in series on one end of the loop, and through a spark gap on the other ends.
Also to note in this diagram Ed has both ends of the first two coils wired in series on both ends making a closed circuit (short)

[truesearch]

@sm0ky2,

I like what you're doing with the Leedskalnin PMH. . . I hope you keep posting your testing and resulting discoveries.[/font][/size]