Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

Started by synchro1, August 31, 2014, 09:26:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: synchro1 on September 09, 2014, 02:09:54 PM
@MarkE,

How do you measure a loss when the input drops as the rotor accelerates? Maybe you'll start to pretend you know more then Nicola Tesla like that other know it all show off, hiding in a side tracked portion of the London sewer system like a Sax Rohmer character, not Tyrone Power:
One measures actual input and output power.  Incremental efficiency gains can be interesting, and exploitable or a nuisance depending on the circumstances.

Magluvin

Quote from: synchro1 on September 09, 2014, 09:52:58 AM


Everyone's told magnets are the worst choice for a coil core, because they 'Gum up the coil" too much. So, you're right about increased magnetic viscosity hurting efficency, but the loss helps increase "Lenz acceleration" by delaying the pole shift past TDC and suppling propulsion to the rotor at lower R.P.M.! Got it?



Lets say we have a rotor with 4 magnets N out and 1 stator coil with a magnet as a core, S facing the rotor.  Just for example, we short the stator coil and spin the rotor.

As the rotor magnet approaches the stator coil, the stator core magnet attracts the rotor magnet.
When the rotor magnet field starts 'cutting' the windings of the coil on the approaching side, the coil will produce a field opposite of the core magnet, lessening the field strength of the stator core magnet. During the time that the rotor magnet is cutting the approaching side of the coil, the rotor and core magnets attraction is lessened, instead of increasing as the 2 mags come close to alignment. Then as the rotor magnet is very close to center of the stator coil magnet and very little rotor field cutting the coil, the attraction bounces back to near max.

Then as the rotor mag passes center, the rotor is slowed down naturally due to strong magnetic attraction. But when the rotor mag starts to cut the coil windings on the departing side of the coil, the coil produces a field that strengthens the field of the stator core magnet, creating even more pull back on the rotor mag, slowing the rotor down even more. 

As for magnets as cores of inductors/transformers, here is what I know.

The only advantage that I know of, is a magnetized core can store more energy than a standard core before core saturation.  It has to be a DC pulsed setup, whether its an inductor or transformer in order to take advantage of the larger storage.  The coil field must oppose the magnets field, like winding a spring, then the field collapse creates desired output. In theory, the coil field can store enough energy that would oppose the magnetic cores field till the cores field is completely reversed and the core finally saturates from the opposing field, opposite of the magnets original field.  If the coils field adds to the magnetized cores field, the core will saturate well before the normal core.

Mags

TinselKoala

Quote from: synchro1 on September 09, 2014, 06:23:50 PM
MileHigh developed the extremely efficient MHOP circuit on my "Self Accelerating Reed Switch" thread that looks like a natural for the two coil power circuit under consideration. The circuit includes an onboard "Stroboscope". This circuit replaces the need for a signal generator and a Laser Tach. I rejected this initially because I didn't feel it would run up to "Lenz Delay" R.P.M. threshold speed; However, raising the output coil ferrite core "Magnetic Viscosity" with tail magnets like Doug demonstrates, would help it interface! 


The trigger and power coils would be joined on the "Flop Over" to Hartley Oscillator.


Who developed that circuit, you liar?


https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa8F1PebS_EX7AX2aA_ZZtb9

TinselKoala

Quote from: synchro1 on September 09, 2014, 02:09:54 PM
@MarkE,

How do you measure a loss when the input drops as the rotor accelerates? Maybe you'll start to pretend you know more then Nicola Tesla like that other know it all show off, hiding in a side tracked portion of the London sewer system like a Sax Rohmer character, not Tyrone Power:


Who are you talking about now, liar? You aren't talking about ME because I don't know more than Nikola Tesla and never claimed to. I just know more than YOU. A lot more.




synchro1

                                                           Obey your "Almighty Ruler" or every living thing will die!