Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

[NoBull]

What if you put a bar magnet in an empty solenoid coil and cut the magnet in half lengthwise (the cut is parallel to its length, which is also the direction of its magnetization direction) ?

[MarkE]

For MarkE, MileHigh and others that support Di-Pole Field line closure of Magnetic Field Lines:

Physics for MANY MANY Years has done an experiment, yes its repeatable, every day of the week, by children, yes children!

A long Solenoid, has NO MAGNETIC SURROUNDING IT

Every physics professor on the Globe, with an Equator at is centre, between the Poles of its very own Di-Pole, Where Gravity is 3% less, and many hundreds of other effects can be seen, would be ashamed to have such a bunch of fools on the planet!

You, who support Field Line Enclosure from pole to Pole - Have been proven WRONG! Children can prove you WRONG Science is laughing at you right now.

MarkE, Milehigh - believe what you want, but you've been proven wrong! Todays Science, not just me and others here, can prove your Imaginary and Flawed Compass Experiments to be beyond pitiful NON-SENSE!

Astro Physics even disagrees with this NON-Sense:

Once again you are worse than wrong.

[MarkE]

That is why I said pulled apart or not exactly lined up,, this does create a Block wall region.

You get a Bloch wall when:

1) You point two like poles towards each other.
2) You otherwise orient two adjacent domains so that they are not aligned N-S.  For instance at 90 degrees to each other.

The one place where you do not get a Bloch wall is between two aligned domains. 

So if one puts two magnets close to each other or in direct intimate contact and they both point pretty much the same way, there will be few Bloch walls.  EMJUNKIE has been jerking everyone's chain with his utterly and totally nonsensical farce that there is a Bloch wall bisecting a magnetic dipole.

Comparing that region to what is supposed to be found then is a starting point.

Then, as I mentioned, when you open the viewing window furhter and see what the rest of the feild lines are doing might allow for a simple observation to see if those interactions that would be seen either follow the Block wall region or change into the normal closed path shape.

Again to have a Bloch wall you need adjacent unaligned domains.  Since in a PM almost all the domains point the same way, there is no macro level Bloch wall.  There will be small localized walls only.

I would think that if this interaction is present then it should show over the entire range of interaction and not just within a local area field effect.

I know that I can blow a bubble within the existing field effect area,, just like I can blow a bubble under water,, so would doing that and having the bubble move past this assumed interactive area behave differently as it crosses that boundary?

If by boundary you mean Bloch wall, to paraphrase Tim Allen:  "There is no "quantum flux". There's no "auxiliary". THERE'S NO GODDAMNED BLOCH WALL. You got it? "  The conventional explanations account for all the observations you have brought to the discussion.  Multiple experiments have been offered that support the truth of those conventional explanations.  Where is the exception?

[EMJunkie]

Once again you are worse than wrong.

More DENIAL!!!! Science doesn't exist and we are all worms is that how it goes MarkE 

[minnie]

     Usually words used in electrical components have an every day meaning, eg "tank".
Take "domain" and it means a realm or kingdom. So can I assume that when used
in connection with magnets, say, domain would apply to the whole of a bar magnet
if it was pure and fully magnetised?
                  John.