Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

Started by hartiberlin, September 27, 2014, 05:54:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 58 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: itsu on January 10, 2015, 06:36:16 PM

Ok,  wide part of the magnet stack scanned, sensor fixed from above, sliding the magnet stack underneath it (1cm)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-5WxjH8IqM&feature=youtu.be

Regards Itsu
Yep, that is as should be expected. 

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on January 10, 2015, 06:30:19 PM
Your depiction is absolutely wrong.
My depiction is correct in regards to the useful magnetic field. This i have said time and time again.

Both Itsu and AC have shown this to be true with your very own test.
Like i said before Mark,you are including your !field of dreams! into the picture.

tinman

Quote from: allcanadian on January 10, 2015, 06:17:33 PM
@tinman

If we were to plot the "difference" between the center zero plane between the two poles and the looped conventional paths then yes I believe it very well may follow the line you have depicted. To be honest I never thought of that until I saw your diagram.


There are points where the parallel and perpendicular measures from the hall sensor appear equal within the field where the two planes intersect.


I should be able to add another sensor at 90 degrees and plot a second graph with labview. Then a third graph showing the difference between the two and follow the line.


AC
I will be looking forward to that AC.

MarkE

Quote from: tinman on January 10, 2015, 06:54:45 PM
Thank you Itsu,TK and AC for doing these test. Different results from TK to that of Itsu and AC,so where dose that leave us?
TK's parallel facing tests agree with:  theory Itus's tests and my own.  Itsu's perpendicular tests agree with theory and my own experiments with ceramic and ferrite magnets.
TK's perpendicular facing tests with nearly uniform readings may have saturated the sensor amplifier.  That would have been particularly likely if his magnets are very strong. 

Pirate88179

Quote from: MarkE on January 10, 2015, 07:29:23 PM

TK's perpendicular facing tests with nearly uniform readings may have saturated the sensor amplifier.  That would have been particularly likely if his magnets are very strong.


I believe TK said in one/both videos that his little magnets were N52, which is very strong.  I have mostly N40 (or thereabouts) here and they are incredibly strong.  I was surprised to see that they did not mess with his meter.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen