Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

[EMJunkie]

Why is it that we use government to build and maintain the roads, water lines, and sewer, but we use private companies to provide power and data transmission?


  Easier to regulate and tax the private companies on profits and users indirectly than to actually provide a service in exchange for taxation?

@Sparks - government, ha, a debate I will not enter. I have a very low opinion on government!

Kind Regards

  Chris

[MarkE]

@Mark - I think you missed my point - I meant, off grid, your own Energy Machine 

Chris

Now I got it that is the epitome of the old Edison model and suffers its weaknesses. 

[EMJunkie]

Now I got it that is the epitome of the old Edison model and suffers its weaknesses.

@Mark - All Systems have a weakness, some much more than others. Lore holds here! But still, that's what we are here for!

Chris

[MarkE]

@Mark - All Systems have a weakness, some much more than others. Lore holds here! But still, that's what we are here for!

Chris

Often we find that what is old is considered new.  In a fully distributed but isolated model, everyone has their own energy source.  They are then limited to the: capacity, availability, and reliability of their private source.  On the other, they don't have to pay anyone else specifically for their supply.  They must pay for their worst-case requirements up front.  Shared networks must only support the worst-case requirements of the entire population.  Except where transmission is expensive this is a big advantage.  Each user only needs to contribute a bit more than their average usage and their portion of the transmission facility cost.

[MileHigh]

@Mark - All Systems have a weakness, some much more than others. Lore holds here! But still, that's what we are here for!

Chris

Chris:

I think it's worth summarizing your points and where they stand:

1.  There is a Bloch wall at the center of a bar magnet.

There is clearly no Bloch wall at the center of a magnet.  And no, you are not allowed to change the definition of "Bloch wall" to suit your needs.  I noted that you got very luke warm in pushing this false idea after a while yourself.   At this point in time are you prepared to concede that you were wrong?

2.  "Something" is going on with magnetic fields.

This is an undefined theme that you have harped on with literally dozens of examples.  Whenever the examples were legitimate they clearly backed up the commonly accepted understanding yet you kept on claiming victory for the "alternative" view.  This whole argument was a complete mess and as time went on any perception that you were stating something substantive grew less and less.  Add to that your frequent evasion with respect to questions posed at you and in the end no progress was made.  Also, to me it became readily apparent that you were not capable of contributing to the more technical discussions.

So in the end Chris, you came off as a lightweight making all sorts of proclamations but you clearly did not possess the technical competence to back up all of those proclamations.  It's just the classic case of a guy that tries to bluff his way through.  You didn't make it.

Anyway, I hope this was a learning experience for you and you can get something positive from it.  If you want to do something positive, you should take down any YouTube clips of yours where you claim that there is a Blich wall at the center of a magnet.

Finally, don't you dare call me or anyone else around here a "paid shill."  That's pure crap and you know it.  Towards the end you started to use that term when you were technically cornered and you had no way of getting out of it so you resorted to that nonsense.

MileHigh