Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

Started by hartiberlin, September 27, 2014, 05:54:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

EMJunkie

Quote from: MarkE on January 13, 2015, 10:35:18 PM
In a lossless transmission line the propagation velocity is:  c/(uR*eR)0.5.  Most of the time in cables and etch inside printed wiring boards, uR is close to 1.0 and it is the eR that sets the velocity.  Typical printed circuit boards have eR values of 4-5 so the velocity is half or less of c inside the board.  The speed actually varies depending on how much of the fiberglass is glass and how much is resin.  At the ferocious data rates that we have today that can be a big problem because how traces line up with the glass bundles changes their timing.  In a coaxial cable that uses low density PTFE foam the average eR is only about  1.2 and the velocity is about 0.9 c.  Traces that run on the top side of the circuit board send some of the energy through air above the trace and other energy through the board material underneath the trace.  These components run at different speeds and that distorts the signals.  But what can really drive fast signals batty is the protective nickel plating that is often applied between outside traces and gold top finish.  Nickel has a high uR.

Ok, not bad MarkE. We can markE this as an answer because its close enough to what I was looking for.

See My point MileHigh!

MileHigh

Quote from: MarkE on January 13, 2015, 10:35:18 PM
In a lossless transmission line the propagation velocity is:  c/(uR*eR)0.5.  Most of the time in cables and etch inside printed wiring boards, uR is close to 1.0 and it is the eR that sets the velocity.  Typical printed circuit boards have eR values of 4-5 so the velocity is half or less of c inside the board.  The speed actually varies depending on how much of the fiberglass is glass and how much is resin.  At the ferocious data rates that we have today that can be a big problem because how traces line up with the glass bundles changes their timing.  In a coaxial cable that uses very low density PTFE foam the average eR is only about  1.5 and the velocity is about 0.8 c.  Higher density of PTFE increases the eR and further reduces the propagation velocity.  Traces that run on the top side of the circuit board send some of the energy through air above the trace and other energy through the board material underneath the trace.  These components run at different speeds and that distorts the signals.  But what can really drive fast signals batty is the protective nickel plating that is often applied between outside traces and gold top finish.  Nickel has a high uR.

You are amazing Mark.  As you know, 25 years ago, clock frequencies were much lower and you could pretty much ignore this stuff.

MileHigh

Quote from: EMJunkie on January 13, 2015, 10:39:02 PM
Ok, not bad MarkE. We can markE this as an answer because its close enough to what I was looking for.

See My point MileHigh!

I gave you the real short answer - the impedance of the medium determines the velocity.

MarkE

Quote from: MileHigh on January 13, 2015, 10:40:54 PM
You are amazing Mark.  As you know, 25 years ago, clock frequencies were much lower and you could pretty much ignore this stuff.
We are approaching 48Gbps over a single pair with goals to get to 100Gbps before the end of the decade.  We are talking very wicked fast.

MileHigh

Quote from: MarkE on January 13, 2015, 10:42:45 PM
We are approaching 48Gbps over a single pair with goals to get to 100Gbps before the end of the decade.  We are talking very wicked fast.

The entire Library of Congress in 17.9 seconds!  lol