Gyroscopic Inertia Generator

[Scorch]

11/15/14

Hello everybody. 

Just another build photo.
This is the pulse motor rotor consisting of two polocarbonate disks complete with stainless steel screws, magnet retainers, and magnets.

These are very powerful, N52, magnets rated at 115 pound pull and I must empathize with Willie E. Coyote every time I am working with magnets this powerful... 
See: www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=DX8C-N52&cat=168

One must be VERY careful not to lose control of these magnets.
They must be handled with great respect and held firmly and care must be taken not to allow the magnet to be attracted to another magnet or attract, in, something unwanted from the work bench such as a wrench, screwdriver, hot soldering iron or a barrel of TNT...

It has also been my experience that the tolerances in these QM kits are pretty tight so I always make sure the shaft is installed in the disks and/or hubs before final tightening of hardware; otherwise parts may not line up properly.

}:>

PS: Just discovered I ordered the wrong size disk magnets for the other rotors and now waiting for parts again... 

[synchro1]

Quote from Milehigh:


"The magnetic fields generated by the two coils on either side of the rotor magnet will mostly cancel each other out".


What a QUACK!

Yet even more preposterous malarky from the supercilious fraud:


"The real conclusion from your experiment is that the attraction and repulsion forces are approximately the same for the same configuration based on your data plus error tolerance".

[synchro1]

@Tinman,


               The test really demonstrates very little the way you did it. You need to test the pull of a coil of twice the windings on one side then compare the pull to the two coils of half the turns on both sides. You'll find that if you double the windings on one side your imaginary advantage will disappear. The advantage comes from two pole attraction to a ferrite rotor as TK points out.

[tinman]

@Tinman,


               The test really demonstrates very little the way you did it. You need to test the pull of a coil of twice the windings on one side then compare the pull to the two coils of half the turns on both sides. You'll find that if you double the windings on one side your imaginary advantage will disappear. The advantage comes from two pole attraction to a ferrite rotor as TK points out.

Sorry synchro,but you are incorrect. The way i carried out the test is correct,and doubleing up on windings will change nothing in regards to what i have shown. Sure,add double the windings to the coil,drop your P/in and retain the same pull/push force. But then you just add another coil the same to the other side of the magnet to once again half the P/in,and retain your pull/push force.Regardless to what ever you do to your coil on one side of the magnet to increase the magnetic field strength and drop the power consumption,you simply put another coil of the same type on the other side to once again half the P/in and retain your pull/push force.Also by adding another coil to the other side of the magnet on the rotor,you eliminate the side ways pull/push on the rotor,and the system becomes ballanced.

MH is also correct when he said the repulsion and attraction force is the same,takeing into account test error margin's. After conducting a more precise test in regards to attraction and repulsion force with a given P/in,the results were exactly the same.

[MileHigh]

Quote from Milehigh:


"The magnetic fields generated by the two coils on either side of the rotor magnet will mostly cancel each other out".


What a QUACK!

Yet even more preposterous malarky from the supercilious fraud:


"The real conclusion from your experiment is that the attraction and repulsion forces are approximately the same for the same configuration based on your data plus error tolerance".

Synchro1, you can kiss my ass.  This kind of nonsensical idiocy from you has been going on for well more than a full year.  You made a complete ass of yourself when ConradElectro was testing his bifilar coil.  Your stupid behaviour may be the reason he stopped sharing his test results on this forum.  You make stupid idiotic comments like the ones above for your own cheap thrills and mental masturbation.

For Christ's sake, you are a 50-year-old man, can't you act like one?

I would like to see you post an apology to me in this thread and also state that you are going to smarten up and stop your stupid asinine behaviour from this point onwards.

MileHigh