Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Some Questions That Need To be Asked

Started by Freedomfuel, September 14, 2006, 03:24:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Freedomfuel


I know that this is going to upset Lindsay, but someone has to say it and it might as well be me so here goes.

1.  A video dated 1997 shows a TPU system brought to an advanced state of development, but nine years later still no sign of a product in the market.  Are there insurmountable technical problems holding things up?

2.  How can we reconcile Steven?s statement that ?I have never personally sought money for the technology? with the statement by Stan Deyo, one of the Australian group who attended a demonstration, that Steven sold the rights to the TPU to his attorney Paul Stemm for $10 million.

3.  If Stan Deyo is telling the truth then why would someone settle for a paltry $10 million when keeping control of the invention could make them the next Bill Gates?

4.  If Steven did not sell the rights to the TPU to UEC how did UEC gain control of the device without money changing hands?

5.  Why does Steven not what us to see the patents granted to UEC for parts of the TPU?  Do these patents really exist?

6.  Is the Universal Energy Corporation a real company and are there public records that can be consulted that show records of this company? 

7.  If the UEC really exists who are the shareholders and were shares raised by making demonstrations of the TPU?

8.  Was Steven the mystery inventor whose invention was announced by an euphoric Steven Greer during a radio interview with George Noory in January 2003?  It is the opinion of Stirling Allen that Steven was that inventor.

9.  If Steven really did demonstrate his technology to SEAS between 2002 and 2003 with a view to selling the rights to the TPU was he acting as an agent of Paul Stemm?  This is where things get really murky.  During the December broadcast of George Noory?s Coast To Coast Show Greer said that this inventor was ?unduly influenced by a third party to not cooperate? and ?A corporate lawyer and a business person that had been associated with this inventor stopped the whole transfer dead in its tracks?.  This ?corporate lawyer? and ?business person? sound as if they could be Paul Stemm in which case Steven was acting on his own initiative, but how come he was trying to sell something that did not belong to him?  Also the fact that he was trying to sell the TPU to SEAS contradicts his statement that ?I have never personally sought money for the technology?

10.  Why is Steven living abroad at a secret location?  Has he been threatened or harassed?

11.  In the latest video there are no head shots and no-one is named.  Why do the participants want to conceal their identity?

PaulLowrance

I'm glad somehow has the guts to stir the pot to see what's happening.

I remember hearing Mr. Greer live on Coast To Coast AM. I have no idea if Steven Marks was the guy, but he sure could be, but I thought Greer said the guy was threatened.

This is so typical. There's always some individual or company that gets our hopes up and then whamo!  We cannot allow these situations to discourage us even if they are legit or not.  If things get out of hand and they totally 100% destroy this industry then yes someone needs to investigate these matters in hopes clearing things up. Is Steorn the next whamo, lol?  Man I sure hope not!!!  If so, then I sure hope people begin to listen that there might be group(s) whose agenda is to distract people away from legitimate devices and destroy this industries reputation.  That's why I am surprised of such very little work on the MEG and now to find there are people spreading false information that the MEG destroys your cells, lol.  In all humor and no offense, but a majority of the people on this forum just might be people with such a fore mentioned agenda.

Paul Lowrance

giantkiller

Let's get thick! Is Steven Greer the same one on the videos here http://www.alienvideo.net/seti-makes-contact.php?
And is he in one of the SM3,6,17 Videos?

Freedomfuel

Yes, this is the same Steven Greer who has claimed in a radio interview that SETI has made contact.  He is not in any of the Steve Mark videos that I have seen but I believe that SEAS did make a video of Steven demonstrating his device in 2003 and this video may have been made available on the internet for a while.  Someone must have a copy, so I hope that they upload it to Stefan.

The reason I started this thread is because despite the apparant authenticity of the device, the sincerity of Steven in his letters to Lindsay and his plausible explanations of how the device works it is still obvious to me that something strange is going on.  Let's face it.  Neither Steven or his associates are running a business in the normal way.  This could be because they are trying to evade attempts by the US government and vested interests to delay this technology being brought to the market.  However, this is what the conmen always claim to explain their inability to be provide a return for investers.  The Genesis World Energy scam run by Patrick Kelly is an example.  The example of the TPU is different because after 12 years no-one has come forward to claim that Steven and his associates have taken investors money under false pretenses.  In fact there is no evidence that they have solicited funds for investment at all.  So what is going on?  My hypothesis is that Paul Stemm represents the corporate interests who would have most to lose if the TPU was made available to the public and that he made Steven an offer he could not refuse.  According to a former associate of Dennis Lee the going rate for buying out a new energy inventor is $10,000.  This would explain why three years after Paul Stemm is suppsed to have informed SEAS that he was developing the TPU for commercialisation nothing has happened.  This would also explain why Steven tried to give the TPU to SEAS because he new that other avenues to bringing this technology to the public had been blocked.  When that failed he threw his last dice and attempted to put plans on the internet  but not before informing us of how the device worked.  Think about it.  If he was a conman would he go to the trouble of writing ten pages of letters to Lindsay?  If he was sincere then he must have risked his life to bring us the information about the TPU so we owe it to him to make use of this information and bring the TPU to the public just as he wanted.

EMdevices