Vaccinations; recent developments

[sarkeizen]

but not so easy when you hit double digits, like in the examples cited above.

Exactly what examples?  The only example about vaccines you've produced is one that is clearly refuted.

I mean why hide data in the first place, if everything is on the up and up ?

What data do you think has been hidden?  Any reason you can't just clearly make your argument?  Is it really that easy to destroy that you need to hide it from me?

[SeaMonkey]

Alberta, Canada - where Allcanadian claims to be from.

That, of course, is the kneejerk response you've obviously
been 'programmed' to believe and to deliver.

There is, however, a LEGAL DEFINITION of 'AB' which specifies
what IT is and where IT is located.  Are you familiar with
Legal Fictions?

With just a bit of research effort you should be able to discover
some clues.  The detailed and truthful LEGAL DEFINITION may
take much more effort unless you have a suitable resource at
your disposal.

It goes along with the deceptions which are so much a part of
the 'governments' of this age.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Ever notice how the cabalists consistently avoid the fact that vaccinations are just one weapon used in the war against humanity ?

Focusing on the semantics and minutia are the main ways to avoid addressing the entire picture...its along the same lines as compartmentalization.

Regards...

[sarkeizen]

Ever notice how the cabalists consistently avoid the fact that vaccinations are just one weapon used in the war against humanity ?

However you have yet to provide any credible evidence that it's a weapon.

[sarkeizen]

I was under the impression that the Overunity forum was a collection of open minded individuals who are interested in alternative energy and alternative health discussions.

I think it's more a community of narrow minded counter cultural zealotry.   You are a prime example of this.  I mean look at what you write.  Immensely arrogant, sweeping generalizations.  Entirely devoid of useful argument or evidence.   So no, you fail (miserably) the open-minded test.

It is quite surprising that there are people here who strongly defends the use of mercury in human bodies especially babies.

It's just a risk assessment.  So far Thiomersal is an exceptionally low risk.

I simply cannot fathom

Yes.  This is the problem.

What is the safe level of mercury in the body ?

Yawn.  Arbitrary standard of evidence.

One simple answer :  ZERO.  If it was safe, then the body would have produced it or has receptors specifically for them in the first place.

This is wrong in so many ways it's almost impressive.  Your body regularly creates chemicals which are lethal to it at particular dosages and you regularly ingest chemicals which your body can not biosynthesize.   Is there a particular reason you are as ignorant as you are?  Did you not go to school?