Vaccinations; recent developments

[Pirate88179]

Don't even want to go there where cancer is just lazy people not hunting for food!!!!

Cancer is caused by lazy people not hunting for food?

Man, what sort of drugs are you on?

Holy crap!  Or better yet....

Great Scott!

Bill

[joel321]

Man, what sort of drugs are you on?

I'm use to speaking in a psychophysical way mostly. Cancer is two things only 100% genetic and influential!!! Those are the only two things!! Being more at risk of cancer is mainly to the genetic code! And I believe in medicine to a certain extend but then I see GREED, or, ignorance. When a doctor believes he knows everything there is to learn in life just because he is only HELPING the immune system fo the body.

Doctors only HELP the immune system of the body = nothing else nothing more!. And this is very simplistic and expected because our "evolution" is what got us here and not doctors healing bodies? Well here I go again getting ahead of myself!

People need to hunt for food in order to process it! It is not just a matter of feeding them GENERIC stuff! Since the world is not generic! How to explain this?

The facts are that there are millions of microbes in all animals bodies trying to take over the body. Cancer is just the immune system trying to protect the body. "inflammation" cancer would not exists if the body would not protect the body!!! period. So you have to understand how the inflammation first occurs? Define the inflammation 100% from all angles and then define the preventative measures and then from that you will understand those that are born genetically predisposed!

But for some reason I don't have a feeling you can think about that!

Holy crap!  Or better yet....

Great Scott!

blah blah blah, explain how cancer is born? Explain inflammation and how is born? Then explain the steps the inflammation gets inflated? It is really not that hard to understand! It is all genetic or influenced. That is all. There is nothing more to try to figure out. Obesity causes cancer....being skinny causes bulimia....plain and simple stuff!

I seriously don't think you have the thoughts of how cancer works!

Well lets prove that right now today!

How does cancer work? (remember when I asked you how dishwashers work and you JB welded a fan blade lol. From that simple explanation of how dishwashers work, it showed you only based 'fixing" dishwashers by that alone! where you failed miserably. So I find it hard to believe anything that comes out of your writings/mouth, truth be told = facts)

[sarkeizen]

I'm use to speaking in a psychophysical way mostly.

Your phrasing isn't very cogent.

Cancer is just the immune system trying to protect the body.

How exactly?  What success rate would this have?  Cancer is an umbrella term for a number of different diseases which are related by all having various rates of unregulated cell growth.

[ramset]

According to Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, by 2025, half the kids born in the U.S. will be diagnosed with autism.Dr. Seneff isn't respected by the ivory towers of the pharmaceutical medicine paradigm or industrial agriculture, but she has something to say about autism. She is a computer scientist who transitioned into biology and toxicology, so people like to attack her credentials, but what Dr. Seneff has to say is key, and many other mainstream researchers have been negligent in reporting these findings.
She has been studying autism for over 7 years, along with the environmental factors that lead to the disease. Decreased exposure to sunlight, poor diet, vaccines (specifically aluminum and mercury), as well as glyphosate [color=rgb(27, 142, 222) !important]toxins[/color] from RoundUp are causing skyrocketing rates of autism. She explains this in a two-hour presentation given recently at Autism One.
Aluminum and Glyphosate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2025....remember 2005 ,that's how far away we are from 2025...
1 in 2 .thats a BIG change for your society .


Heresy.... silly.....?


snark,  you better start paying attention..the next generations to hit the planet ,will be  quite "modified"
very odd ..very odd indeed...


Chet

[sarkeizen]

She has been studying autism for over 7 years, along with the environmental factors that lead to the disease. Decreased exposure to sunlight, poor diet, vaccines (specifically aluminum and mercury), as well as glyphosate [color=rgb(27, 142, 222) !important]toxins[/color] from RoundUp are causing skyrocketing rates of autism. She explains this in a two-hour presentation given recently at Autism One.
Aluminum and Glyphosate

Well firstly AutismOne is a conference for cranks but let's put that aside for a minute.  Shall we? Next it's worth looking at her webpage and see that while she has lectured a fair bit about these topics - she has published virtually nothing.   As someone who knows something about universities I'll tell you this.  As long as you don't get arrested or cost the institution money.  They don't care what you lecture on.  The majority of this persons education is in EE and CS.  So when some uneducated person says Seneff has been "studying autism for 7 years" they don't mean the same thing as someone who actually researches autism.  However, again let's put that aside.

Of the things on her website I saw a presentation she made for the Weston Price foundation which specifically mentioned vaccines.  So I looked at the slides.  While they don't give her notes, you'll see that most of what's being presented is just stuff from other known cranks.  Like Blaxil and Habakus. 

So what I'd suggest is that Seneff adds nothing to the discussion.  She has done virtually no original research and relies on people who are almost complete morons in their methodology and treatment of research.  IMHO you could cut off Mark Blaxil's head and he would continue produce equally useful information to what he has been making his money off for the past years.

The 2025 prediction isn't mentioned much but were I to guess it's probably based on extrapolation based on the idea that already refuted arguments are correct.  If you have anything directly linking to the math they are using for this prediction (but not a video I have little patience for one of the slowest methods of transferring information) I'd be happy to show you how stupid they are being (or admit I'm wrong but more likely the former)