Vaccinations; recent developments

[SeaMonkey]

Please provide a cite.

Un-published study results may never be cited
although it is possible to make mention of them
with certain limitations.

Any study result which would raise questions or
criticisms of current vaccination policy (90%
manpower requirement) are never officially
acknowledged.  Only those studies which
demonstrate an efficacy of approximately 25%
(for flu) are made available to the public and the
rank and file military members.

Government contracts for military vaccinations are
lucrative business.  A certain percentage of the vaccines
are experimental which makes the military members
equivalent to 'guinea pigs.'

Refusal to 'take' a required military vaccination is an
offense punishable under the UCMJ.

[sarkeizen]

Un-published study results may never be cited

So you're saying you have no idea what the figure you quoted means.  Very like you.

Any study result which would raise questions or criticisms of current vaccination policy are never officially acknowledged.

Since we are taking about citing.  I'll assume that "officially acknowledged" you mean published in a journal that can be cited.  Which is clearly untrue but to know that you would have to read studies in journals.  Which you don't seem capable of.  In fact for all your whining about truth you seem to just regurgitate things on websites.

(90% manpower requirement)

Made up figure?

Only those studies which  demonstrate an efficacy of approximately 25% (for flu)

14% isn't approximately 25% and I've already mentioned that figure.

Any chance you'll say you were wrong.  Didn't think so.

[Cap-Z-ro]

I am telling you that IGNORE is a wonderful feature.

Especially with the ego concussions I gave the forum's self appointed arse kisser.

Last time I checked, 32 people have Crap-Z-ro on ignore.


Bill

Well, I have been here doing the spade work for what...30 years now, I believe.

And Yeah, I may have snapped a troll spine or 3 along the way...but I may be over selling myself here...who knows how many of them were simply multiple moniker trolls.

And of course, browned off the self appointed and incredibly stupid arse kisser to the shills and trolls.

Everyone has seen too many members leave or be hounded by those very same naysayers nitpickers and trouble makers that end up whining after taking runs at me...my, what another coincidence.

Regards...

[SeaMonkey]

Sark-Eizen,

Within the military establishment there exists a
body of research knowledge which is 'classified'
and made available only to those within the
compartmentalized environment with a 'need
to know.' 

The research data relating to vaccines and vaccinations
is more extensive than you might possibly imagine.
The knowledge which is being withheld from 'the public'
is astonishing.

There is much deception in all that is fed to the public.

The numbers of military men and women who've been
gravely incapacitated or lost their lives as subjects of military
vaccine research is staggering.

Military deaths 'in the line of duty' or 'in service to the country'
are exempted from normal legal remedies.

You are either aware of this and are engaging in purposeful
deception or you are one of the deceived 'useful idiots.'

The power of the 'contract' is awesome.

[sarkeizen]

Within the military establishment there exists a body of research knowledge which is 'classified'
and made available only to those within the compartmentalized environment with a 'need to know.' 

In other words there is a very low degree of transparency and therefore it is less reliable than non-military research.

The research data relating to vaccines and vaccinations is more extensive than you might possibly imagine.

We're talking about efficacy (and potentially safety) data.  The reason you think this is so easy is because you don't understand how research is done.  It's not your fault.  You probably don't have much more than high-school math and all you appear to do is read the absolutely lowest quality information written by some of the most ignorant people imaginable. Ok, that last part is your fault but being unable to differentiate is probably the fault of however you were educated.

The truth is the military can do all the studies it wants, it can spend it's entire budget and all the shadow budgets you can imagine and employ every enlisted, reserve and start kidnapping civilians at random and...would still be unable to get a significantly different result.  See there is, to anyone who took even an introduction to statistics - a law of diminishing returns when it comes to research.

There is much deception in all that is fed to the public.

There is, but the vast majority comes from websites like the ones you post...and people like yourself. Again when it comes to efficacy you can believe that the military spends all it's time inoculating people then exposing them to a disease.  However it's not likely that they will get a different result.

You are either aware of this and are engaging in purposeful deception or you are one of the deceived 'useful idiots.'

This is what logicians call a false dichotomy.  You are stating there are two possibilities when there are more than two.  For example one other possibility is that you are simply mistaken...another is that you're deluded.