Vaccinations; recent developments

[sarkeizen]

sark, can you explain the difference between "aluminum salts" in a vaccine from "aluminum" that a baby would get from the breast milk?

Most of the research I've seen about the contents of breast milk doesn't differentiate the initial compound of the aluminum.  Either it's simply not being researched or by the time it reaches the child it's been reduced to elemental form.  Aluminum hydroxide is in a few different medications including some antacids - where it is the primary component.

Now why would you want to plug the sweat glands with "aluminum salts" (antiperspirant)? How that does make sense in your mind? Does that not sound kind of stupid to you? or maybe it's something done because businesses need to sell a product?

Because the waste products of specific bacterial are not very pleasant smelling and the lipids from particular sweat glands are their food.  Reducing the food means reducing the waste which means reducing odor.  For people who have more lipid producing sweat glands this is useful for other people it is not.  In Japan there is almost no such thing as antiperspirant because Asian people have an allele which causes them to have fewer lipid producing glands.

Ironically it's companies that use natural remedies like baking soda in their deodorants which are the people trying to scam you or more specifically it's because of people like SeaMonkey who spread around wrong information which makes companies attempt to market to the uninformed.

I have a feeling the same attitude is in medicine = sell products.

Medicine has one of the highest (if not the highest) quality controls and efficacy standards of any widely used human product.

[sarkeizen]

Strong Evidence of sincerity you say?

Well you and a number of others here are completely uninterested in attempting to falsify your own views.  It's simply far more likely for someone who is seeking out ways that their ideas might be incorrect to end up with correct ideas than people like you who seek out ideas which happen to agree with your pre-existing prejudices.

[Tink]

Well you and a number

What number?

of others here

Yes, and so?

completely uninterested in attempting

Think so?

correct ideas than people like

Well,...

your pre-existing prejudices

Nah!

Thanks  Sir Trollalot for your insights, it is very much appreciated.

[sarkeizen]

What number?

Well you would be part of the list of intellectually dishonest folk on this post as you...
a) Seem to have no problem presenting weak evidence which will probably mislead people and...
b) Seem to have no problem allowing others to post weak evidence without commenting on it's misleading nature.

So, at least from where I stand you don't care if people are fed good information or bad information as long as they come around to your point of view.  Perhaps that's considered ethical where you come from?

it is very much appreciated.

I live to serve.

[Tink]

Well you would be part of the list of intellectually dishonest folk on this post as you...
a) Seem to have no problem presenting weak evidence which will probably mislead people and...
b) Seem to have no problem allowing others to post weak evidence without commenting on it's misleading nature.

That is a load of codswallop Trollalot!

So, at least from where I stand you don't care if people are fed good information or bad information as long as they come around to your point of view.  Perhaps that's considered ethical where you come from?

And that is again a load of codswallop.

I live to serve.

Serve who?
Your paymasters?
Not the parents who need vaccine information to save their children from harm!
I very much dislike you for trolling this thread with disinformation.