Vaccinations; recent developments

[sarkeizen]

He probably takes 30 pills a day?

If the evidence for 30 pills a day was strongly in line with my desired outcomes.   Why wouldn't I?  Or why wouldn't anyone? 

So far I'm not chronically sick so I don't take any medications regularly.  However when the doc prescribes them - such as antibiotics after having some dental work done.  I happily took them.  I skipped the 600mg of Ibuprophen - analgesia has a pretty wide amount of variability and I find I rarely need it.

Look at any LABELED "sick" person how many pills they take a day?

A pretty small amount.  Only 6.5% of Americans are taking more than 4 prescription drugs.  Compare that to the NPH intake in Canada where something like 43% are taking about 2-3.

[Pirate88179]

Mags:

No worries.  I had no problem with your reply at all.  I too like carrots, and carrot juice.

Rush just happened to use carrots in his example, but as you see, you can use anything, including air for this example.  I do agree that some folks partially listening will go away thinking there is something wrong with carrots.  This is how disinformation gets started.  Someone misunderstands something said by someone else and...so on...and so on.

I actually tried the air thing on a guy at work and he said it was not true.  But, it is.  He did not get it.

Bill

[sarkeizen]

I read a few articles where people have cured their own cancer with carrots. One article said a woman with stage 4 cancer did a regimen of 3 pounds of organic carrots into juice per day, and cured her. The big problem with healthcare in the big picture is that they dont embrace a good diet for the patients.

The big problem with people who say things like "3 pounds of carrots cured my cancer" is that it's probably not even the tiniest bit correct.  Statistically people today who have cancer try radical changes to their lifestyle again statistically cancer can self-resolve.  The most likely outcome of any self-resolving cancer (today anyway) is someone who will claim that it was the result of something they did.  Another group are those who have a cancer where some of the symptoms regress temporarily.  Again they try radical lifestyle changes and when regression happens it's all because of Kumkwats or Selenium or shoving coffee up their ass.  Jess Ainscough who I mentioned earlier had this exact effect with her epithelioid sarcoma.  She thought she was getting better and then she died at age 29 when amputation would have had her living until she was 80.

Killed, in part by people like yourself.  Congratulations?

Anyway it's interesting that you swallow diagnoses from people who have no reason to make a diagnosis but completely reject those who do.  Again this is why I expect you're a troll.

My made-up mom-patient was told the other day not to skip any meds and 'dont change your diet'

Dietary control of cholesterol is actually something of a controversy medically speaking.  So in real life this isn't all that far fetched.  However more generally your made-up situation is not true.  Most docs do council about lifestyle.  Most patients don't want to hear it.

So what Im going to do is eat the pasta n ragu every other day for a few days and see if the effects last, and if they do, I will stop for some days to see if pain comes back.

How would you calculate the odds of your diagnosis being correct?  Whoops.  You don't know do you.

We have to work and do research

So let me see if I understand you.  According to you a "researcher" can go out look up all the studies that confirm a hypothesis.  Ignore anything that says otherwise and deliberately avoid looking for that information...and that would be, in your opinion "research".

[Magluvin]

The big problem with people who say things like "3 pounds of carrots cured my cancer" is that it's probably not even the tiniest bit correct.  Statistically people today who have cancer try radical changes to their lifestyle again statistically cancer can self-resolve.  The most likely outcome of any self-resolving cancer (today anyway) is someone who will claim that it was the result of something they did.  Another group are those who have a cancer where some of the symptoms regress temporarily.  Again they try radical lifestyle changes and when regression happens it's all because of Kumkwats or Selenium or shoving coffee up their ass.  Jess Ainscough who I mentioned earlier had this exact effect with her epithelioid sarcoma.  She thought she was getting better and then she died at age 29 when amputation would have had her living until she was 80.

Killed, in part by people like yourself.  Congratulations?

Anyway it's interesting that you swallow diagnoses from people who have no reason to make a diagnosis but completely reject those who do.  Again this is why I expect you're a troll.Dietary control of cholesterol is actually something of a controversy medically speaking.  So in real life this isn't all that far fetched.  However more generally your made-up situation is not true.  Most docs do council about lifestyle.  Most patients don't want to hear it.
How would you calculate the odds of your diagnosis being correct?  Whoops.  You don't know do you.
So let me see if I understand you.  According to you a "researcher" can go out look up all the studies that confirm a hypothesis.  Ignore anything that says otherwise and deliberately avoid looking for that information...and that would be, in your opinion "research".

"However more generally your made-up situation is not true."

Made up.


Water and pills folks. Thats all you need for a healthy life, just as God intended.

Mags

[sarkeizen]

"However more generally your made-up situation is not true."

Made up.

Yep.  Unless you're telling me that you would consider someones life so utterly inconsequential that you would take the advice of natural news without consulting any actual research papers.  Seriously, it's a fine troll but call it what it is.  Just something you made up.

Water and pills folks. Thats all you need for a healthy life, just as God intended.

Yawn.  Strawman.