Vaccinations; recent developments

[Magluvin]

VAXXED film pulled from Robert De Niro's Tribeca Film Festival following totalitarian censorship demands from pharma-linked vaccine pushers and media science trolls

Learn more:

  http://www.naturalnews.com/053445_VAXXED_film_Robert_De_Niro_Tribeca_Festival.html#ixzz44AIvdlK5


Mags

[Tink]

How Aluminum in Vaccines Affects Your Health

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/04/03/aluminum-vaccine-health-effects.aspx

[Dog-One]

VAXXED film pulled from Robert De Niro's Tribeca Film Festival following totalitarian censorship demands from pharma-linked vaccine pushers and media science trolls

Yeap.  Just as a thought.

myself i have a policy of not depending on magic for my health needs.

Fritznien on the other hand will instead trust the CDC with his life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdCU2DfMBpU

Not me.  In fact doing the exact opposite of what the CDC tells you is likely far safer.  I'll stick with my "bleach".  It works and works well.

But to each their own. 

[AlienGrey]

Vaccines fuck em I say, they are toxic, if anyone tries sticking a needle in you, my advice is punch their lights out !

[SeaMonkey]

Warning: Don't read this article if you want to avoid feeling an unpleasant sensation in the pit of your stomach.

The issue here is: refusing to believe an uncomfortable fact.

An unpleasant fact.

A devastating fact.

There is a simple formula that describes how the public refuses to believe an uncomfortable fact.

It goes this way:
"Well, if that were true, then..."

It's a statement that suggests a person is standing at the edge of a cliff. And if he accepted some particularly unpleasant fact, he'd suddenly fall off.

Another way to look at it: if he accepted this fact, it would lead, by contagion, to him admitting there were other very uncomfortable truths. And then, by extension, like branches quickly growing out of a tree, a whole host of multiplying shocks would become known.

So it is, in the area of vaccines.
The experts, like preening peacocks, assure us that the shots are amazingly safe. After all, they've done the studies. They've published the studies.

There is widespread fraud in those reports, because, for example, of the short follow-up period—as if adverse effects could only occur in a 72-hour window, or over the course of a few weeks. Who decided that? Who made that arbitrary rule?

And then, most importantly, studies are not real life. We have seen glowing assessments of medical drugs in print, but when they are (like Vioxx) released for public use, people start dropping like flies.

In the case of vaccines (in real life), the one system for reporting human damage is broken. Completely broken. It's called VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It's run by the CDC and the FDA. (My readers are aware of how many crimes and lies I've laid at the door of those two august agencies.)
...

Full Article here.  Vaccine Damage:  The Hidden Truth