What's wrong with this

[tinman]

We agree that it takes energy to convert material from liquid phase to gas phase.  We agree that gas can be converted to liquid by removing heat.  We agree that heat can be removed without adding energy when one has a heat sink that is below the phase change temperature for the pressure.

Do we agree that a gas(of a certain type)can give of heat when returning to a liquid?

[Qwert]

Thanks for the inquiry

Your question is one of the first to be asked, that's relevant to the topic, and I think it's

This site I found good in case when I cannot find an answer for my question(s) otherwise. And there are really much more reliable sites (on the net and out of the net) comparing this one.

[Qwert]

Minnie and qwert.

The way you present your knowledge, I see as you don't know what you are talking about. Despite that I'm not an expert here.

[tinman]

The way you present your knowledge, I see as you don't know what you are talking about. Despite that I'm not an expert here.

What i know is what i see in front of me.
Let me ask you this Qwert. If you seen something happen right before your sober eyes,and then read in a text book,or had others tell you that it's not possable,which would you believe?.

If i said i could show you !what you call! an OU event,would you believe me-->probably not. That is why Mark is going to do all the explaining in his very own word's.

What you need to understand is that every device that uses electrical power is unity when every source of energy coming from that device is taken into account. The law that states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed but only transformed confirms this. Your little 12 volt DC electric motor is a unity device when all energy output's are taken into account-mechanical output,heat output,vibrational output,and the likes. It all equals the energy input when added up. My device is already unity before anything after the transformation takes place. We then use the forces that mother nature provides to gain a total output that is greater than the input. It is not an OU device to me,but more a device that taps an as yet unused energy source. The simple solar pannel dose just this,uses energy that the sun already provides to give a power output that is free energy to us. The sun is also the source of hydroelectric power generation-no sun ,no evaporation-no evaporation=no rain,and no rain means no hydroelectric power station. No sun also means were all cactus anyway,so no need for any sort of power.

[MarkE]

Do we agree that a gas(of a certain type)can give of heat when returning to a liquid?

Of course it gives off the heat of evaporation.  However, its mass:  That stays the same.  (I am ignoring the tiny adjustment for mass/energy equivalence.)