Lenz free generator

[i_ron]

we can speculate off forum.

Regards

thanks, you could check your inbox


Ron

[Magluvin]

Ok. Just did a quicky test before I go further. Rotor just spun up by hand.

First pic and scope shot is what I described in my last post. It was a core that was already wound to see possibly anything. And there ya go.

The second set with the core set up like the Orbo cores were in reference to the rotor. Some, but very little output

In the first set I want the winding to be tighter, like I said earlier about 1/4 of the core wound, but the larger core Im going to be using I want possibly 1/16, so when the mag passes, it doesnt brush the winding, as in the max field density only being over one portion of the coil at a time.

And the second set which is orbo positioned naturally doesnt put out much as the closest windings are moving inline with the field, so no cutting. Some though. What we did see in the scope shot are probably outer weak fields inducing from the magnet pass. If you can imagine it, you will see. So tiny output, due to weak fields at greater distance from the affected windings.


So after I wind a new core and test that, then make a setup with the diametric mag shown in the pics below and spin the mag in the core and see what we get without core cogging.  That core will have a bunch of little windings going around, so there is always output. Opposite sides of the core windings can be in series. Working on how many windings I want to do.

[Magluvin]

Woops, one more thing...

With the Orbo setup as in the second set of pics above, they had the cores wound all the way from end to end, which may further reduce rotor mag influence of the winding output. But with the core I had shown above, if I turn the core on its axis so the winding is on top and the mag just crosses over the bare core at the end of the winding, I get greater output. Also if the windings are down I get the same.

Mags

[Dog-One]

..., and yet, when we review the accepted literature, we find support, and the insane doesn't look so insane anymore.

Not only support, but it practically smacks one between the eyes with the obvious.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukBFPrXiKWA

Though not everyone can see why a semi-permanent magnet would be a useful thing to have.

Instead, we do the same thing in our devices, day after day, paying for it at every instance.  Not so smart grasshopper.

[i_ron]

The only time we truly fail, is when our effort is centered around the idea of copying and pasting, the term being thrown around is "replication". 


Regards

A misconception. This is the very basis of our learning process.


When we see something being done it brings out the questions...what did he do, how did he do it, what did he do it with? and the final question, can I do that?


For example if we never saw anyone ski then we should in all probability never give it a thought. But having seen someone ski then the questions start, ah, he is using two thin boards just a bit taller than myself... and somehow they are fastened to my boots... you know the story...then by refining the items used with the process of standing upright and sliding down the hill we are ski-ing. We have learned through replication. It is not a bad word.


Ron