Lenz free generator

[EMJunkie]

What if !some! here learn the difference between beat frequency propagation,-- nodes,and antinodes in electromagnetic standing waves.


Brad

Hahahaha - Turbo Charged Induction - I like this idea!!!

Magnetic effects vary on the square of the Current.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[tinman]

 author=i_ron link=topic=15307.msg490912#msg490912 date=1472856669]

I guess you are right! At that time I was coming in on erfinders side... now I am coming in on Brad's side. Confused by the ongoing virulence? you could say so


However I stand corrected on Duff and Keshe. Thanks for the heads up! I knew Alex was and a certain energiser club but that was news to me. However I stand by the sentiment of the quote that I posted. To justify that, it is my opinion that these false fronts often sprinkle their work with actual facts to try and make it believable. Then it just becomes a matter of winnowing out the chaff.

Hi Ron

It's not about taking side's.
The existence of this forum is built on searching for truth's,and weeding out the rubbish from the roses. It is about presenting fact's,and removing fictions,and we do a good job most of the time-->but some times the weeds just keep coming back.

I will give you an example of fact and fiction--Jim Murray's dynaflux generator.
Here we will look at the first part of the video,which is about his original dynaflux generator.
In this video  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK3JOlY0V8Y  at 12:30,he states that this machine(the dynaflux generator) presents no load on the prime mover when power is drawn from the generator.

Lucky for us,all the information is in the video,that clearly shows a very heavy load being placed on the generator.
I will show and explain as to why people are missing this load when Jim draws power from the generator to light the bulb's.

The first screenshot below shows the power being drawn by the prime mover to run both it self,and spin the generator assembly.
We can see that the power consumption is 127.9 watts.
Now remember,this is !before! the field magnet is switched on-->127.9 watts

The second screenshot shows the power consumption of the prime mover !after! the field magnet is switched on,but !before! a load is drawn from the generator-->the load is the two bulbs.
We can now see that the prime mover is drawing !wait for it!-->a wopping 434.62 watts of power-->and no load is being drawn from the generator yet

So we have gone from the prime mover drawing 127.9 watts,to it now drawing 434.62 watts
That is a 339.8% increase in power consumption--and no load is being placed on the generator yet  . All Jim did was switch on the field magnet--nothing more.
The field magnet it self consumes 121.72 watts of power,but i have left that out of the calculation,as the electromagnet could be replaced with a PM.

Now,in the third screenshot below,Jim has connected the load(the two bulbs)to the generator,and those two bulbs are dissipating 40.09 watts of power.
This is the point where Jim states that the machine(the generator) hardly loads the prime mover  ,when in actual fact,the prime mover was heavily loaded before Jim placed a load on the generator.
This load placed on the prime mover at the moment Jim switched on the field magnet,is in the form of eddy current generation,and the power used to create these eddy currents and resistive heat was 312.9 watts.

When Jim switches on the load to the generator(the two bulb's),and states that the generator places no load on the prime mover when doing so,is nothing more than rubbish,as the load was placed on the prime mover !before! he switched on the two bulbs.

The reason that no reflection was seen on the prime mover the moment he switched on the bulb's,is because some of that 312.9 watts of waste heat energy,was transformed into electrical energy to run the bulbs.

Can i prove that waste heat due to eddy currents can be converted into electrical energy-->you bet ya butt i can. And at the very same time,in the very same video,i show exactly what Jim show's,in that when i light my two bulbs,it places no load on the prime mover.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IVxO94mcB0


Now you know why i call Jim Murrays dynaflux generator a big heater,and a very poor generator.

These are things Erfinder will not show you--he would prefer you did not know,as it would become apparent that Jim is not !tha man!
Erfinder also hates using instruments to make measurements,so it is ironic that Jim's(Erfinders hero) own measurements,in his own video,shows just how poor the dynaflux generator actually is at generating power--but it makes a great heater.


Everyone here has the right to choose what they believe,but this one is a no brainer,and i have presented all the data required for those here to see the truth about the mighty Jim Murray,and his wonderful dynaflux generator.


Brad

[EMJunkie]

To be fair, I think Jim Murray's early work was helpfull. Before he got involved with the Murakami Army.

Some deception is apparent these days. Like sharing 80% of SERPS with the public, then saying because a Patent is pending, no more will be shared. The critical part.

Everyone should be carefull, when one shows a Concept, it is possibly the start to an understanding and not the entire device.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[tinman]

To be fair, I think Jim Murray's early work was helpfull. Before he got involved with the Murakami Army.



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Bingo 


Brad

[forest]

We only have to answer the question : would the beat frequency when used as a source for tank circuit , affect the original place where it was created ? Or : if the mix of frequencies produce other frequency and that frequency is used to pump LC circuit how this would load the original source ?