Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Lenz free generator

Started by life is illusion, December 21, 2014, 03:20:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 43 Guests are viewing this topic.

barbosi

Quote from: EMJunkie on September 18, 2016, 05:02:02 PM

Ampere Turns (AT) = Turns (N) x Current (I) and Magnetomotive Force (MMF) = Turns (N) x Current (I) - As you can see the formula is the same. Ampere Turns is in Units of MMF.

In a Coil of Wire, with Turns (N) carrying Current (I) where the Current is Uniform and all moving in the same direction, what do you think the result would be? What would the effects of this Force be?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Oh, that's fine and dandy but those formulas do not explain where magnetic field goes when it collapses, does it?

This guy explains it with same usefulness what you did:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUh29nkLwao

Nice try, but I'm not convinced.
When the Power of Love overcomes the Love of Power, there will be peace.

tinman


barbosi

Quote from: tinman on September 18, 2016, 07:07:12 PM
Rocket science  :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3gjlskQOJ4


Brad

Funny, but no!

It's in the damn elementary books on electricity, you gonna feel silly when you'll see it, all have seen the picture.

It's about 2 fields in quadrature relationship...

Nothing yet? the junkie guy is not so junky if his ignores it...

No, nothing? What a hell, here is a picture:
http://helios.augustana.edu/~dr/102/img/17_07.jpg

And this is a third time I am helping you and so far I didn't get any thank you, but rather insults.

Regards.
When the Power of Love overcomes the Love of Power, there will be peace.

EMJunkie

Quote from: barbosi on September 18, 2016, 07:51:45 PM
Funny, but no!

It's in the damn elementary books on electricity, you gonna feel silly when you'll see it, all have seen the picture.

It's about 2 fields in quadrature relationship...

Nothing yet? the junkie guy is not so junky if his ignores it...

No, nothing? What a hell, here is a picture:
http://helios.augustana.edu/~dr/102/img/17_07.jpg

And this is a third time I am helping you and so far I didn't get any thank you, but rather insults.

Regards.



BarBozo - You are completely wrong!!!

Technically the image you show is wrong also.

Why?

Static Charges have no Net Magnetic Field associated with them!!! Static Dipole is also subject to the same criteria! This is why you're wrong and don't know the difference between the two!!!

You move the Charge, and now it is no longer static, then a Magnetic Field is associated with the Moving Charge!!!

Your Image should include a relative Velocity associated with the Charges and then it is Valid to have an associated Magnetic Field. So, Basic Text Book Concepts have fooled you into a situation where the hole you now sit in has no ladder out!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


barbosi

Quote from: EMJunkie on September 18, 2016, 09:16:47 PM


BarBozo - You are completely wrong!!!

Technically the image you show is wrong also.

Why?

Static Charges have no Net Magnetic Field associated with them!!! Static Dipole is also subject to the same criteria! This is why you're wrong and don't know the difference between the two!!!

You move the Charge, and now it is no longer static, then a Magnetic Field is associated with the Moving Charge!!!

Your Image should include a relative Velocity associated with the Charges and then it is Valid to have an associated Magnetic Field. So, Basic Text Book Concepts have fooled you into a situation where the hole you now sit in has no ladder out!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

That's your skewed view on electricity. You learned electrostatics has nothing to do with electrodynamics and you swallowed that shit till the brains were squeezed out through the scalp pores. Then you combed. Damn!

But if you can make an intellectual exercise, replace those "charges" with wires?  Can you feel the familiar domain of electrodynamics, or really you want a picture from the beginning of the 20-th century? Do you recognize the fields now?
Now a quiz for you, science parrot: please identify by the color the fields and name them! I don't mean to be disrespectful about eventual physical abilities, but if you are color blind, let me know and I'll look for other picture in different shades. Internet is full of them I don't know how you could miss them. with wires too, not only electric charges.

As per the electrostatics, I prefer the works of the Master, and I attach a picture he used in his electrostatic experiments. Please enjoy the full description directly from the reading material, as you will find him completely describing his transformer. Please don't tell me that it has nothing to do with your prostitution you call partnered coils. I do this here because I don't feel spreading my but chicks over that topic too.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/9b/Tesla-DisruptiveDischargeBox.png

Don't forget the quiz, truly yours,
barbosi


PS: about electrostatics the way you still need to learn, here is a link, scroll down to "Electric Force Example".
What is the force that can be obtained with 120W? 1.01 Million Tons!!!
In your face. And don't tell anything about not being electrostatics, go in top of the page again and read "Coulomb's Law". Made by some scientists from... read the web address.
And Tesla did not lie. It's only our sorry a$$es incapable to put together the concepts he left us.

Now slap yourself and quit drinking! You are not helping, your are confusing people!

Next !!!!!
When the Power of Love overcomes the Love of Power, there will be peace.