Lenz free generator

[minnie]

Why do you all blame poor old Lenz when it's really
Newton?
          John.

[i_ron]

I am going to stick my neck way out here and probably get it cut off.  But I think this may be part of what Erfinder is trying to get us to see.  If you look at the attached circuit you will see that as you pulse the transformer one of the secondary windings is shorted.  When the pulse is removed the short is also removed allowing the collapsing magnetic field to charge the cap through the bridge I have across the other secondary winding.  The transformer is a standard 120 volt primary with a tapped secondary with an output of 12-0-12.  The interesting thing is with the coil shorting technique I can pulse the primary with only 12 volts and charge the cap to over 12 volts.  There should have been only 1.2 volts going to the cap.  But pulses do strange things with transformers.  And shorting one of the secondaries does even more strange things.

Build this circuit and try it both when shorting the secondary and without shorting the secondary.  See what you get.  You can use whatever you want to control the transistors but I have included a simple 555 timer circuit if you don't have a function generator or microprocessor to give you the pulses.

Carroll,

It has come to my attention that the 680 ohm resistor for Q1 going to the bottom of the coil could lead to problematic operation of Q1.

Would it not be better to go to the top of the coil? (battery Plus)

Thanks,

Ron

[lancaIV]

Newton and Lorentz Transformation : + https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lew_Dawidowitsch_Landau
                                             
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FLew_Dawidowitsch_Landau&edit-text=
                                                           + https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Dmitrijewitsch_Sacharow  Slojka(Blätterteig) Design

           page 43,# 643 : hyperphysics-link nuclear (thermocryobaric) power

BiNomische              Term
                                 Terminology
                               DeTerminanten 
                               DeTermination

U.S.A.      Atomar/Nuclear program developed in co-development by german re-/searcher/scientists
U.S.S.R.                                                          idem
                 f.e. "The red Baron" von Ardenne
https://translate.google.de/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FManfred_von_Ardenne&edit-text=

West-Germany,counter-part : Carl_Friedrich_von_Weizsäcker


https://www.google.pt/search?client=opera&q=binomische+determination&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8



https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19850508&CC=EP&NR=0140041A1&KC=A1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corea-war : (east-) german consult strategy    who won ?   How and why ?
                                                                                             Probably Clausewitz, do not know !
                                                                                             For me not of interest !   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Lenz free generator : SUPERCONDUCTOR
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Bednorz https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Alexander_Müller

[citfta]

Carroll,

It has come to my attention that the 680 ohm resistor for Q1 going to the bottom of the coil could lead to problematic operation of Q1.

Would it not be better to go to the top of the coil? (battery Plus)

Thanks,

Ron

Ron,

I see what you mean but I built it like the schematic and it seemed to work OK that way.  I have used that same idea of the resistor from collector to base with an opto-coupler for controlling relays with no problem also.  But a high resistance load or straight resistance could cause a voltage drop at the collector to be large enough to cause problems with the resistor connected there.  If I was going to go to the top of the coil I would probably increase the resistance value according to what transistor I was using.  By the way I didn't show on the schematic but the transistors are 2n3055s.

Carroll

[web000x]

Ron,

I see what you mean but I built it like the schematic and it seemed to work OK that way.  I have used that same idea of the resistor from collector to base with an opto-coupler for controlling relays with no problem also.  But a high resistance load or straight resistance could cause a voltage drop at the collector to be large enough to cause problems with the resistor connected there.  If I was going to go to the top of the coil I would probably increase the resistance value according to what transistor I was using.  By the way I didn't show on the schematic but the transistors are 2n3055s.

Carroll

Hey Carroll, can you tell me some things about your circuit? 


With the circuit as is and the capacitor discharged to 0v, how much potential available in the cap is harvested from the collapsing magnetic field after one pulse?


Now take the same circuit (starting at zero volts) and remove the shorting transistor so that the coil does not short, how much potential is gathered in the cap  after one pulse?


And one last one... Can you take the above two situations and repeat them, but this time adding a FWBR to the primary and funnel that into your output cap in addition to the secondary?  By putting this across the primary, it is going to fill the cap to a starting point of Vbat - 2 diode drops of voltage.    From here we can calculate energy by taking the difference in energy of the two potentials.


I would do this but am working on rewinding a motor core and don't have a lot of time...


Thanks


Dave