Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

No, you are basically mimicking the old Monty Python "Argument Clinic" skit by saying "No it isn't" to any evidence presented.Please point to this evidence you allege.Again, I and others have written out many times the specific evidence against EMJ's nonsense claims. And after many months of this your reaction is:  "No it isn't."Like anyone else you are going to do what you like.You repeat the assertion that someone must see EMJ's supposed circuits first hand in order to analyze them despite the fact that circuit analysis and simulation are both a very mature arts.  You can choose to insist on your position in opposition to the way the multi-trillion dollar per year electronics industry operates.Repetition is indeed not proof and that cuts in all directions.  I have stated as others detailed analysis and in the case of Itsu and TK detailed replications of EMJ's BS claims.  All have falsified his claims.  You repeat that you reject all that as evidence.  You are free to live as ignorantly as you choose.Cover your eyes, plug your ears, stomp up and down.  That's your right and your choice.Again the evidence that I have presented is there for anyone to view.  You simply choose not to do so.Now you are just lying.  But what else is new?Given that you keep ignoring the hard evidence presented we can expect that you will continue the way you have indefinitely.

MarkE - I am very surprised at the Tone in your post here!

You're angry! Sad! and a bit messed Up!!! Also Very Inbred:

[EMJunkie]

You seem to have trouble interpreting the very equations you have written down.

Could it be the very same trouble you have MarkE? ASSUMPTIONS? No, my post is based on fact, verifiable by experiment.

MarkE you are the ASSUMPTION King!

[EMJunkie]

Well, it seems this thread is getting more hits now than when I first started it: 77465 times

Nearly 6000 hits in a few days!

I hope others are enjoying the humour! Also enjoying the little tid bits of real un-adulterated engineering, tried tested and true with no MarkE ASSUMPTIONS!!!!

The King of Assumptions must know by now, building a Bridge, make an assumption and accidentally get it upside down??? Surely this is obvious to such a smart bloke! Or is he paid to make ASSUMPTIONS

[EMJunkie]

The obvious:

Induction, Lenz's Law (the -) is a Changing Magnetic Field in Time!

EMF, Lenz's Law, once a Current Flows, is a Changing Magnetic Field, which is the first requirement of Induction....

It is well known by engineers, when the Transformer is loaded, there is a NET ZERO Magnetic Field. This means the Ampere Turns on the primary are equal but opposite to the Ampere Turns on the secondary, or close to it. Each Magnetic Field Opposes the other at any point in time. See Coil One, opposes Coil Two:

So if we invoke Lenz's Law/Induction Twice, we see:

[EMJunkie]

Where Coil One, Induces an (-)EMF in Coil Two, Coil Two Induces an (-)EMF in Coil Three

Where the (-) shows that the Magnetic Field is in reverse to the Primary Inducer of the EMF...

Again, See how simple this is!