Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[stupify12]

Void,

Read and review the pdf shown here. Then review the Vladimir Uttkin pdf files then think clearly like a kindergarten with no added Quanterion Math..


Meow

It appears the discussion forums here really could use some sort of moderation to help keep discussions more constructive.
There is a world of difference between constructive criticism/suggestions, which usually can be expressed in just
a few posts, as compared to deliberate attempts to insult or otherwise be rude or disruptive, etc., in order to try to derail
a discussion. Constantly repeating the same sort of thing over an over in multiple posts is also not constructive.
Much of the posts that have been made in this thread really just serve to derail the discussion here. Constructive criticism can
always be made respectfully, if a person just makes a little effort and employs a little bit of self control.

If someone doesn't want to listen to another person's suggestions/constructive criticisms, then so be it. A point can
be made in a post or two, and if a person is not going to consider your suggestions, then simply move on. The point has already
been made. No need to keep repeating it over and over again. Too often here, criticisms made are really just veiled or outright insults.
That, of course,  is not a constructive way at all to carry on a discussion.


John.k1, Ramset:  Thanks for posting those links. It looks really interesting. I will read through it later
when I get the chance.

All the best...

[Void]

Void,
Read and review the pdf shown here. Then review the Vladimir Uttkin pdf files then think clearly like a kindergarten with no added Quanterion Math..
Meow

Hi Stupify12. I have read through both PDF's. I have also already done a fair bit of experimentation with such coil arrangements 
over the last several years, and I have seen some interesting effects. I am still experimenting. My mind always operates at
a kindergarten level. It's the best I can do...
All the best..

[minnie]

   Void,
         some sort of moderation should be avoided.
  If topics aren't kept towards the top of the page-they die!
             John.

[ramset]

Minnie
topics will die here for sure,but I a sure you  ...those more controversial things with merit have found other places to work ,  However things will always work there way back to this and other open source forums.


you can only take so much google teaching,   sometimes it takes doing too....

respectfully


Chet

[synchro1]

It is a mechanical resonance caused by the geometry. Change the mass of the magnets or the length of the strut and watch the resonance occur at a different frequency. Watch the video and note that the magnets engage in "frenzied twirling" at many different readings of the... what?

Also, for the second time, where in the video is an actual measurement of frequency to hundredths of a Hz precision?

Keep it up, your ignorance is slightly amusing. You don't even seem to know what a "standing wave" actually is. The action is a consequence of "the frequency" and the mechanical geometry of the parts. It has _nothing_ to do with Schumann resonances. Change the geometry and you will see the resonant frequency change as well.

@TinselKoala,

You have alot to say for somebody who's too cheap to even buy a tiny bar magnet or a neo sphere. I own hundreds of magnets and like playing with them. Let's see you back some of these false claims of yours up with some evidence! The balance magnets react at different frequencies because the Shumann resonance has harmonics. Magnet geometry in no way causes the pattern of resonant harmonics.