Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

@Tinman... I think you might benefit from reading this entire article, slowly and thoroughly, and meditating upon the contents. And this is just a very basic introduction to what is _actually_ known about magnetism and how it behaves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field
You will find descriptions of what the field is, how it is measured, how the concept of "field lines" relates to the field, and much more. This is a scientific description of magnetism, not a philosophical one which might tell you "what it is _really_". Fortunately the world of working things that surround us doesn't depend on philosophical answers but rather on scientific ones. What is magnetism "really"? Nobody knows, least of all those who don't know what it is scientifically.
You may find that magnetism is _scientifically_ a bit more understood by conventional physics than you make it out to be. Your analogy of understanding the workings of the car is apt: You are like your wife, just a "key turner" when it comes to magnetism, and there are many people in the world who are like you when it comes to your car: they understand the workings of magnetism quite well, they aren't just "key turners" . If you want to play around with words and cross over into philosophy, you don't know what matter is really -- nobody does--, so you don't really understand your car at all, since it is made of matter. You don't understand "why" gasoline burns in the cylinder, you just know the conditions under which it does burn. And so on. You seem to be mixing up science and philosophy, like a child who asks "why is the sky blue" but who won't accept explanations about atmospheric Rayleigh scattering, wavelengths of light and spectral response of the human eyeball. "But why is it _blue_, Daddy?". You might as well just throw up your hands and say "because God's favourite colour is blue". But that explanation won't help you design anything that actually works, like a lidar interferometer.
You are also incorrect about field lines and topo contours. There is indeed an underlying reality to both, even if you choose to deny it in the case of magnetism due to your "key-turning" level of knowledge about it.

[minnie]

     I managed to get an opinion from a lady physicist who's one of this
country's top people. She told me it's "mostly drivel" if they're serious
there should be "calculus" and I'm not seeing any.
                John.

[Dog-One]

OK-you know what-->im done here.

Thanks for all your help guy's,but it seems one can never get things right-even when following suggestions.

Cheers and good luck.

Brad

Happy now guys?

The real question you all should ask yourself is:  "Did you expect anything different?"

[MagnaProp]

As soon as this device achieves under unity, we'll know TM is back on track with understanding proper magnetic physics laws. I suggest a sledge hammer for said fine tuning

[Vortex1]

I have just posted the open voltage sweeps,and will be doing a loaded sweep video soon.
I will be using 200 ohm resistors as the loads on the two secondaries-->would this be a proper load?. The reason for the 200 ohms is because i am only using my FG to drive the primary,and it is limited on power,and we will have both secondaries with loads across them.

The lower the value of load resistors, the less you will see the resonant rise.

If you intend to also compare to the primary drive voltage with the output on the secondaries, you should try to match the impedance of the secondaries.

As an example if you FG has an output of 50 ohms, and you are using an additional 50 ohm drive resistor in series with the primary, that should be matched on each secondary e.g. 100 ohms on each.