Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[wistiti]

Hi Chris!
I have not try this one yet but it is again a really simple device to reproduce.!
I may give it a try soon.
Thank you for what you share!

[Reiyuki]

Hi Chris!
I have not try this one yet but it is again a really simple device to reproduce.!
I may give it a try soon.
Thank you for what you share!

If that above circuit has OU potential, it's only going to be in a specific balanced window.  Can't just wind any bifilar and make it work (I've tried).  It would only be when there is a certain balance to the design.

* You'll probably need some gap distance between the ferrite and magnets.  Especially if they're Neodymium.  Too close and your oscillator will probably not be able to kick the field hard enough.

* # of windings are important for the same reason.  Higher # of turns means more magnetics, but it also means more resistance.  Sweet's bifilars were supposedly 20awg and 240 turns, that should give you at least a baseline to work from. 

* Power capabilities of your oscillator will also determine size.  I believe Sweet was using sine waves so a cheap audio amplifier might work?  I'd try every kind of wave (sine, triangle, square) and compare outputs at various frequencies.

* The load is probably a big factor as well (impedance matching).


Whatever you build, keep a log and record your inputs and outputs with every variation.  It's hard to know what combination of factors is going to give you the best results.

[truesearch]

Yes! Please share your build information and results ~ this design has my interested too. But likely very tricky to get everything just right. . . .


truesearch

[EMJunkie]

If that above circuit has OU potential, it's only going to be in a specific balanced window.  Can't just wind any bifilar and make it work (I've tried).  It would only be when there is a certain balance to the design.

* You'll probably need some gap distance between the ferrite and magnets.  Especially if they're Neodymium.  Too close and your oscillator will probably not be able to kick the field hard enough.

* # of windings are important for the same reason.  Higher # of turns means more magnetics, but it also means more resistance.  Sweet's bifilars were supposedly 20awg and 240 turns, that should give you at least a baseline to work from. 

* Power capabilities of your oscillator will also determine size.  I believe Sweet was using sine waves so a cheap audio amplifier might work?  I'd try every kind of wave (sine, triangle, square) and compare outputs at various frequencies.

* The load is probably a big factor as well (impedance matching).


Whatever you build, keep a log and record your inputs and outputs with every variation.  It's hard to know what combination of factors is going to give you the best results.

Yes! Please share your build information and results ~ this design has my interested too. But likely very tricky to get everything just right. . . .


truesearch

R - No, this is not the case. Again, see: Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation

Trueresearch - See the above Video - Please consider this "Shared"...

After all, lets look at some key words here:

   Self Assisted
   Assisted Oscillation
   Self Assisted Oscillation
   Bucking Magnetic Field
   Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation
   Self Assisted Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation



Now what am I saying here? What have I tried for so long to get accross? Lets start with SIMPLICITY!!! Dont over think this. It really is not hard to grasp the basic concepts.

Bump!!!

For those that do not comprehend, have not been following, but wish to comprehend and follow, to learn something and to achieve a common Goal:

Action: - (Primary Coil) - Your Input. A Magnetic Field, a result of Current Flow in your Primary Coil, that will likely have a Reactive Component. Considered as the Prime Mover.

Reaction: - (Secondary Coil) - Typically considered as a Negative result on the Action. Lenz's Law (the -), a negative result of the Secondary Coil on the Primary Coil.

Counter-Reaction: - (Secondary Coil) - Another Negative result, but this time assisting the Action, the primary, or the Action, but at the same time Countering the Reaction. Lenz's Law (the -).

The two Secondary's are what I call Partnered Output Coils!

These principals can be arranged in many configurations that may result in a working device, and the opposite is also true.

A Hydraulic Ram Pump uses the same principals!!! 300+ Years Old. Self Running, Gravity Machine.


Concerntrate on one thing, the effects in this Video:  Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

If that above circuit has OU potential, it's only going to be in a specific balanced window.  Can't just wind any bifilar and make it work (I've tried).  It would only be when there is a certain balance to the design.

* You'll probably need some gap distance between the ferrite and magnets.  Especially if they're Neodymium.  Too close and your oscillator will probably not be able to kick the field hard enough.

* # of windings are important for the same reason.  Higher # of turns means more magnetics, but it also means more resistance.  Sweet's bifilars were supposedly 20awg and 240 turns, that should give you at least a baseline to work from. 

* Power capabilities of your oscillator will also determine size.  I believe Sweet was using sine waves so a cheap audio amplifier might work?  I'd try every kind of wave (sine, triangle, square) and compare outputs at various frequencies.

* The load is probably a big factor as well (impedance matching).


Whatever you build, keep a log and record your inputs and outputs with every variation.  It's hard to know what combination of factors is going to give you the best results.

@R - When I say no, there is a point where a "Best" output is achieved. But this does not stop the device from working.

Tom Bearden and the others involved with the MEG, were exactly right, this simply is a "Generator" - Thw Motionless Electromagnetic "Generator"

If we refresh our memorys on Induction, whats the first rule?

   Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field

Feed Forward and Feed Back is what this is. This is how it works. So many think that Electrical Energy is totally Consummed by the Load! This is NOT TRUE - Some is. Some can be used to do Work.


E.G: To Assist in the Opperation of itself!!!


Thus the Video Title: Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation

It just so happens that the Magnetic Fields Interact with each other in such a way as to Reduce the Effects of Lenz's Law, Magnetic Fields that Oppose each other.

Like I have said, this can work many ways, but following the basic rules of Electromagnetic Induction will be the most simple.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: When I say a "Shorted Coil" This is supposed to represent the Maximium Possible Load for the Device. For example, These devices will never show any OU unless sufficent Load is connected to the Device. Why? Because Current (I) through Turns (N) with Core Permeability (μ) is the Magnetic Field (B) - We need a sufficent Magnetic Field in Each Coil to make the Device work. It is Magnetic Field Interactions that Give You Over Unity in these devices - So work on getting your Magnetic Fields Up!