Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Meta]

There are still some unknowns, there is a relationship between the Turns of the Coils that I just cant put my finger on.

Anywhere from about 5:1 to 1:3 seems to be an open door but this is not always the case. I don't know why.

Chris Sykes

_____________________________________________

Notice 5 and 3.

3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 are all odd number: 3rds, 5ths, 7ths etc., of an enharmonic octave, used by John Worrell Keely and others.

[Meta]

Also review these overunity.com links under Search term "power dividers"

https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pub-2734280293205008%3Aw8e3l5-sj0c&ie=UTF-8&q=power+dividers&sa=Search#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=power%20dividers&gsc.page=1

[EMJunkie]

There are still some unknowns, there is a relationship between the Turns of the Coils that I just cant put my finger on.

Anywhere from about 5:1 to 1:3 seems to be an open door but this is not always the case. I don't know why.

Chris Sykes

_____________________________________________

Notice 5 and 3.

3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 are all odd number: 3rds, 5ths, 7ths etc., of an enharmonic octave, used by John Worrell Keely and others.

Hi Meta - Yes, that's a good point. I was thinking the 1/4 Wave Length as Don Smith pointed out, but I cant be sure on this either. Interestingly, Floyd Sweet also talks about the same thing:

Resonance frequencies may be maintained quite constant at high power levels so long as the load remains constant. We are all familiar with AM and FM propagation, where in the case as AM, the voltage amplitude varies, and with FM, the frequency is modulated.

However, the output power sees a constant load impedance, that of the matched antenna system. If this changes, the input to the antenna is mismatched, and standing waves are generated resulting in a loss of power. The frequency is a forced response and remains constant. Power is lost and efficiency becomes less and less, depending on the degree of mismatch.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[E_man]

To Chris (and may be to others)
Thanks to YOU, I make my own research. My big problem is, that loss of ferrite material I am using is too big. It is more then 30% of energy in 1/2 period(of resonant circuit) without load.
I believe to lower this loss under 10%, it could be possible self sustain.
At once thanks for Your effort to keep us In (forgive my "english").
E_man

[EMJunkie]

To Chris (and may be to others)
Thanks to YOU, I make my own research. My big problem is, that loss of ferrite material I am using is too big. It is more then 30% of energy in 1/2 period(of resonant circuit) without load.
I believe to lower this loss under 10%, it could be possible self sustain.
At once thanks for Your effort to keep us In (forgive my "english").
E_man

Hi E_Man - Your English is very good, perfectly understandable.

You're quite right, the more "Losses" a System has, the more Energy needs to be made up. So a reasonable efficiency is needed. The Average Transformer is about 80% give or take some. I like to think that's a pretty good baseline to start.

I agree 100% - Everyone needs to make their own way with their own Research! In my path of Research I found it very beneficial to learn key concepts from those before me, the Greats, Floyd Sweet, Lester Hendershot, Don Smith and so many more. I have seen it before so many times, many make fantastic experiments, but really do not grasp the simple concepts of How Energy is Pumped in the first place which only leaves sheer luck for the end result.

If there is direction, then this narrows the "Result by Chance" and a more accurate, better experimental direction can be taken.

I used to think to myself: Many have done it, with only "Resonance" in Coils and Capacitors. E.G: Lester Hendershot. - Now I know the basic concepts to allow that to happen. So do you all.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org