Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[vasik041]

My measurements are not up for debate here.

Hi Chris,

I find this quite unfortunate. I can't understand why you doing it this way.
Why you don't want support your claims with real experiment and measurements ?
But instead asking people do their own research...

I perfomed myself tests with such setup and I saw many other test reports. Almost all OU measurements turned out to be a mistake.

Truth doesn't fear investigation 

Regards,
Vasik

[tibal]

Hey Chris
Great work and thanks for sharing!

I've made a first attempt with two sort of small U ferrites, 60 turns of AWG 30 on each one, in a partnered configuration like yours. Primary is wound on one U over the secondary half with 20 turns of a bit thicker wire. It gets pulsed with 5v, 1khz to 60khz, 1% to 50%. On the output of the partnered coils is a very small bulb. U ferrites are moved to change the gap length, side of contact, etc. So far it didn't produce an unexpected effect.

Could you please tell more on the following aspects?

* Working on small scale is probably a problem. What was the thinner gauge and number of turn you had in a working device not needing hours of tunning?

* In this configuration I can have one, two, or no gap, but only on contact points between U shapes that no coil is covering. In your COP 1.7 it seems one gap is under the secondary coil closer to primary. Do you already know if gap position is relevant or not ?

Thanks!

[alan]

@ALL,

Why are we configuring Two Output Coils so that each Magnetic Field is Opposing each other?

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

Stan Meyer used a similar setup with his charging chokes, he said it was like that 'to limit current', but with your findings we want more current (for more power), only it must not be feedbacked to the input coil (Lenz).

Someone else (user nav) has played with bucking coils before you made your findings known:

http://youtu.be/qT-t6LpYbEc

he made a monopole magnet with it:
http://youtu.be/4T2jyC6N0_g

[wistiti]

Hi Em!
Could you give me your comment about these idea...?
Thank you!

[TinselKoala]

Hi Luc,

You can see in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhQgch4L5XY

Output Voltage goes up to 5.453 only after a few seconds of tunning. This is with a Resistive Load. Voltage and Current must be in phase through a Resistive Load.

A Resistor will not make any difference to this device, in fact if the resistor is wire wound it will not give an accurate result.

Without doing a rebuild on this device, as it is now parts in a box somewhere, re-building is a bit impractical.

I have however attached a Picture to show the RMS Voltage from the Video I have posted online at the above address.

I am not going down the "Measurement" path - Bill Alek a qualified EE has been ridiculed without any evidence to the contrary. My measurements are not up for debate here.

I am giving people the How's, Why's and the Secrets to build their own Devices. Its up to them to make their own decisions.

I encourage people to use their Common Sense and decide for themselves if this device makes sense and is worth the 1hr and $20:00 to Build and Learn.

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

Uh-huh. Would you accept power measurements from someone who says, "Here, hook up you scopes to the output, but first, put this 0.1 uF capacitor in series with your scope probes before you make any measurements".  Because that is what the "qualified EE" Bill Alek does when he shows you readings from scope channels that are _AC Coupled_.
Would you trust someone who blatantly lies during an interview? Because that is what the "qualified EE" Bill Alek did when interviewed a few weeks ago when asked why he hasn't shown his systems to people from MIT etc. He told the interviewer that he was just then introducing the "technology", when it is clear to everyone who follows these things that it is the _same_ system that was demonstrated last year and that he has been touting for even longer than that.
How about trusting power measurements made with _AC-coupled_ scope channels reading the output from a _Hall Effect_ current monitor system that needs precise adjustment and calibration of its _DC_ output in order to produce valid current readings? Because that is what the "qualified EE" Bill Alek does using his black box current monitor.

Ah, but your measurements are not up for debate. There is no possibility that you are making any errors in your measurements or that you are misinterpreting the measurements you do make. That is astounding, truly astounding. You are better than any other laboratory in the world! No crosschecking or examination of your techniques and claims are necessary because you are _always right_! Your "OU" claims are not up for debate!

Yet... you cannot self loop any of your supposed "OU" devices. Are we permitted to even ask you "why not"? Well, I already know why not... and so do you.