Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

@MileHigh,

You "Cocksuckers' nuke chickenshit! TinselKoala ran me ragged because I mistakingly called a relay a switch once. Technically relays are in the switch group. I resented the fucking "Trash Hound" belittling me that greatly me over something so small.

You have a long history of ... shall we say... inaccurate misrepresentation of the work of others, and you yourself have made many claims for which you cannot provide evidence. If you don't want to be belittled... stop belittling YOURSELF with your childish, pottymouth insults and start being rational and ACCURATE in what you claim.

But I know that will never happen, because you have had ample opportunity to demonstrate the truth already, and you have never yet done so.

[TinselKoala]

Not sure what I'm looking for if I build Chris' design.

Yes, that is rather the problem isn't it. But it's not your fault, because he has not provided the measurements that support his overunity claims.

EMJunkie has presented in this thread and the pdf: Claims without measurements in support of the claims. Misunderstanding of simple principles of electronics and measurement. Nonsensical schematics without clarification. An attitude of  non-cooperation and false superiority, even when demonstrably wrong.

So you tell me then. What ARE you looking for when you build something according to Chris's design?

Will you duplicate the nonsensical mosfet and current-monitoring arrangement in the "Exp1 and 2" schematics, as I did? What measurements will you accept as indications of 1.7x OU? How will you know that you aren't just wasting your time, spinning your wheels? Do you have the necessary experience to use an oscilloscope properly, to avoid instrument groundloops, to interpret waveforms without relying on "numbers in boxes" from DSOs.... or do you just push the "Auto" button and display scope measurements that have nothing to do with the real issues at hand?

And by the way... there certainly ARE transformers with one loop of wire as primary and/or secondary... even autotransformers with just a single loop and a tap. For just one example, my wireless power transmitter/receiver system is essentially an aircore transformer with a single loop as primary and another, distant, single loop as secondary. For another, the shaded-pole motors that are all around us use one-turn high current loops as "secondary" : the shading coil. If one doesn't understand a single loop's electromagnetic interactions, one won't be able to understand what happens when many loops are stacked, as in bucking or aiding inductor windings.  For a good example of this, see EMJunkie's pdf for Experiments 1 and 2, where he demonstrates that heavy inductances respond at lower frequencies than lighter inductances, and seems to completely  misunderstand why.

[MileHigh]

Woo!  Hoo!  So we have another replication going!   I hope that Conrad will do one and wasn't too turned off by the bickering.  If he does then we will have three replications going!

[Cap-Z-ro]

Woo!  Hoo!  So we have another replication going!   I hope that Conrad will do one and wasn't too turned off by the bickering.  If he does then we will have three replications going!

Many are wondering if this guy has an off button...and if so, where the hell is it ?

Regards...

[synchro1]

You have a long history of ... shall we say... inaccurate misrepresentation of the work of others, and you yourself have made many claims for which you cannot provide evidence. If you don't want to be belittled... stop belittling YOURSELF with your childish, pottymouth insults and start being rational and ACCURATE in what you claim.

But I know that will never happen, because you have had ample opportunity to demonstrate the truth already, and you have never yet done so.

I never misrepresented anything you asshole. Give me one example where I misrepresented something. Nor have I ever claimed anything without accurate evidence. You're just completly full of shit. You excoriated me because I claimed your bifilar pancake coil threw a larger spark in your dumb comparison video, and you denied that when its plain for anybody to see. Now your ignoring the Shumman resonance frequency once again pretending Jerry Bayles needs a crib pacifier.