Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

1. For a Caduceus coil to work "properly" the crossings should be at 90 degrees, as perpendicular as you can get them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-MA8rzZSqk
"Feedback coil" is two coils "bucking" with a phase reversal switch installed on one.


2. Bipolar Slayer exciter:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcwLFNfxIe8

(the "trigger pickup" on the purple wire isn't shown but it is similar to the method Woopy uses, just a wire in a tight curl inserted into the end of the resonator, not actually connected to the coil itself: a capacitively coupled trigger pickup.)


3. About the Partnered Coils in my testbed, one is tempted to say....

"Congratulations! You have invented the Flyback Transformer!"


4. That scary alien monster can definitely "reach out and grab you" if you get too close! I have the RF burn scars to prove it.

[TinselKoala]

Here's another example of a proper Caduceus coil. Unfortunately there's no demonstration in the video, just the nice coil is shown.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmJg1Kmbgk4

Could one describe these coils as "self-bucking"?

[Vortex1]

The large spike / ringing in the EMJ setup is from the leakage inductance of the " partnered coils". I can show you the same spikes , up to 4kV (with a few tweaks) in a simple circuit simulation or even one that does not use partnered coils but substitutes a single inductor in the diode clamping output network.

For simplicity, here is a simple circuit (without tweaks) with just the ten ohm resistor and a 100uH coil L4 which simulates the resistor inductance.

No "partnered coils" in this one and no coupling between L1 and L4. The HV spikes are almost 2.7kV. measured at the collector. Drive frequency is 1.73 kHz and drive voltage from simulated FG (V2) is 5 volts.

I also have EMJ's actual circuit with the "partnered coils" simulated if anyone is interested.

[synchro1]

What is going on? You have already been told: Mismeasurement, misinterpretation, misrepresentation.http://www.rapidtables.com/calc/light/how-lumen-to-watt.htm
Operating at different frequencies means that different efficiencies are encountered.

Just as I have shown myself... but then my own demonstrations are ho-hum, even when I show the same things that other people show and get all excited about. I show a bulb twice as bright running wirelessly, underwater even, as the same bulb shines when connected directly to the battery powering the system, and people just yawn. If one of your heroes showed exactly the same thing but made up a gobbledegook explanation for it, or hid the transmitter, you'd be all over yourself shouting "Overunity! Overunity!"

@TinselKoala,

There's no confusion about the photovoltaic output from artificial light:

"Estimate desired wattage - read the package to choose desired illumination level. For example, a 3W LED is equivalent in output to a 45 W incandescent".

[Vortex1]

And here is the EMJ circuit, not quite as high voltage spike. The Zener in the emitter is to simulate the high C-E saturation voltage, since I don't have a model for the 2SD1555.

This is very rough, with proper models, a much better simulation can be had.