Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Well, the thing is if you know about electronics then by definition you should have a pretty good grasp of magnetics.  They tend to go hand in hand.

Self-deception is a problem in all areas I suppose.  There are people that play with neo magnets all the time.  If a typical YouTube magnet guy holds a neo magnet in his hand and I say to him, "So how big do you estimate the magnetic bubble is?" without saying anything else.... Chances are he won't make the connection and won't have a clue what I am talking about.

When you have a new discovery or proposition I would be pleased to have a look at it.

Hahahaha - But obviously with you blokes, they don't!!

P.S: its not a New Discovery! Its even my Discovery! Maybe you could say I re-discovered this, but many hundreds of Inventors before me Discovered this Technology!

[Enjoykin]

Thanks EMJunkie !!

.....................................

I have forgot to say - the prime formula for scalar magnetic field H* = - divA  is valid only for the charges moving PARALLEL TO test charge (trial charge).

If the charge moves PERPENDICULAR TO test charge (trial charge), scalar magnetic field H* for it is calculated by next formula

H* = divA. 

Because in this case is different physics of interaction.

We should take in consideration these prime rules so if we want to calculete scalar magnetic field H* at given point of current contour, we need calculation separately for current elements PERPENDICULAR and PARALEL to test charge (trial charge) which is in a definition point.
Then generally speaking - the result will not be zero. With such amendment for scalar magnetic field H* the principle of superposition of fields worth, as well as for vector magnetic field H.

What is most important for us is a formula of longitudinal magnetic force (caused by scalar magnetic field H*)

F = H* I

H * = - divA  is scalar magnetic field (scalar value)
I  is current in the conductor (vector size).
A is vector potential of a magnetic field. 

Constant of proportionality in a formula I was lowered for simplicity.

Reg.
Enjoykin 

[TinselKoala]

TK, you really think Eric Dollard or Aaron Murakami have anything substantial?

No, and neither does (did) Floyd Sweet.

Absolutely you have!

No, I have not. Do you not remember back in this thread? Go read back a few weeks or months and see who built what, and how, and who answered what questions, and who demonstrated your improper use of your oscilloscope, and who got what output from what systems.

I am not perfect, never did claim to be. But, I have been able to move to territory that you TK have not been able to move into. Are you happy with measuring a Lossy system all the time? The New Oscilloscope, will be put to good use if you ever get it, for measuring nothing but a Lossy System. Because that is all you can accept, its all you expect. Its like giving an Oscilloscope to Steve Wonder!!!

Not hardly. You "are not perfect" but you are so egotistical that you claim to be the Saviour of Mankind with your nonsense theory about how coils behave. And you cannot show anything that is _not_ a lossy system yourself. And ... do you still think "AC coupling" is for measuring AC on your oscilloscope? Nobody in this thread is as blind as you have been when it comes to scope usage and measurements. Combining current and voltage from two different circuit branches for an output power "measurement"? I laugh at you, and if Stevie Wonder were an electrical engineer, so would he laugh at you.

The line I was waiting for from you. Your "ZERO" actually describes your understanding. What you expect is what you see, not what is really there! I have 3 really good video's I have shown for many years that show your Total NON-Sense to be words of a person that simply cannot know any better. You can not learn, or understand, grasp, or even connive reality if you have ruled it out and denied it!

I have already shown you that there is NOT "ZERO" on the output, "ZERO" only refers to the Effects of Lenz's Law. But I already know that you can not see basic principals that clearly are being replicated globally by many people.

There's nothing unusual or significant in your videos, other than your demonstration of your ignorance of your chosen topic. Your "nonzero" output is a result of your "partner coils" being connected in Aiding rather than Bucking configuration, and sometimes also due to their unbalanced inductances. In short, you are misrepresenting and misinterpreting your own empirical results, due to your agenda and your lousy measurements.

But; You are right about one thing, if an individual does not Listen, Pay Attention, Understand and Read the Information Given, If one cannot follow BASIC Circuits and Instructions, then that Individual does get exactly: "ZERO"

Which, is Exactly WRONG!!!

   Chris

Let's go back and review again, shall we? How many different documents, explanations and so on were given to you about the use of AC coupling on your oscilloscope, that you simply ignored because you _thought_ you knew what it was for..... but you were utterly wrong.  Don't forget that I constructed coils and circuits according to your directions and had results that even surprised YOU in your pitiful lack of knowledge. And don't forget that YOU NEVER PROVIDED MEASUREMENTS to support your claims of OU or in fact of _anything_ unusual happening in your circuits. Can't follow your own directions? You are Exactly WRONG!!

[TinselKoala]

@Enjoykin:

Who do you think was the first person to mention Gennady Nikolayev on this forum... years ago before his books were available in English? I'll give you one guess.

[EMJunkie]

Exactly WRONG!!

Which TK, is around 25 more globes than you lit with your amazing: Extreme High Voltage: TinseKoil 8 Information Slideshow (corrected)

Also, if your cheap enamel wire could have handled more Voltage then the insulation would not have burnt off. Which means, that and its clearly visible when viewing the video, that many more Neon's could have gone on there!!!

With less Input Power!!!

Of all people here, you were the one that I had hoped could see the light. It seems that Eyes are still only a sensory perception that is very much Censored by Perceptions!