Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[John.K1]

TK, EMark,  do you actually accept Steorn's ORBO claims, that their motor was (is) OU ??

[MarkE]

TK, EMark,  do you actually accept Steorn's ORBO claims, that their motor was (is) OU ??

Of course not.  Do you accept that the Flying Spaghetti Monster created the universe from a tasty pasta plate with oregano garnish 3000 years ago?

Steorn completely failed to provide evidence for their outlandish claims.  This is what their hand picked jury said in June 2009:

Jury Verdict Posted on June 21, 2009 at 2:22pm
In August 2006 the Irish company Steorn published an advertisement in the Economist announcing the
development of "a technology that produces free, clean and constant energy". Qualified experts were
sought to form a "jury" to validate these claims.

Twenty-two independent scientists and engineers were selected by Steorn to form this jury. It has for the
past two years examined evidence presented by the company. The unanimous verdict of the Jury is that
Steorn's attempts to demonstrate the claim have not shown the production of energy. The jury is
therefore ceasing work.

The jury consisted of scientists and engineers in relevant fields from Europe and North America, from
industry, universities and government laboratories. Information about individual members can be found
at http://stjury.ning.com/

A few years later the former jury foreperson wrote these messages on an internet blog:

Steorn seemed initially to think that the jury members should go out
and construct their own devices in order to provide independent proof
that Steorn's concept was valid. The jury made the demonstration of a
working device by Steorn a required first step before they would do
anything else. Steorn accepted this. The criteria we developed for
"working" were much discussed among the jury and I think they were
good ones in the end. The fact that they were never met was the reason
why the jury eventually stopped work.

There was no final report other than the jury's public statement.

Steorn did demonstrate one working device that they claimed created
energy, but the jury disagreed that there was reliable evidence. The
device was later shown advertised by Steorn as a product for
"measuring magnetic interactions". The evidence for creation of energy
was a calculated excess of net torque as the device was stepped around
a cycle. It was not a continuous-motion motor and was only intended to
demonstrate the magnet ideas that Steorn were advancing. The jury felt
that the evidence was below experimental noise levels.


I would say that Steorn were remarkably co-operative. They acceded to
readily enough to the criteria set by the jury. One thing did puzzle
me, however. While it was clear at the first meeting that they were
unable to demonstrate a working device tot the jury, they nevertheless
attempted to show one within months in London at the Kinetica museum.
There had been no mention made of any such plan to the jury. Given
that the idea of the jury was to validate the device, this seemed very
strange.

Ian MacDonald
    Jul 1st 2012

[MarkE]

TK, a 49 page pdf, several videos showing anonymous effects and some 700 + posts here and other forums.... No support...


Hahaha - your stupidity along with MarkE's is just laughable.


You and MarkE are simply Villainous Juveniles with nothing better to do in your Lazy Retirement Days!

More ad hominem attack.  Snooooooooze.

[TinselKoala]

TK, a 49 page pdf, several videos showing anonymous effects and some 700 + posts here and other forums.... No support...

Oh yes, the "49 page pdf" where you claimed to have something which you did not have, a device that actually produced OU... no measurements in support of that claim, which was later removed? The pdf and forum posts where you clearly demonstrate that you don't know how to use your equipment, that you have misconceptions about what they measure and how they measure it, the circuits where you cobble together measurements from different branches to make some  nonsensical "output" measure that isn't even output? Yes, we are all familiar with that pile of verbiage and sketchup imagery. Guess what: there are no "anonymous" or anomalous effects shown in any of _your_ videos and most of your posts in every forum are just trying to inflate your own ego by making more false claims without support, and insulting people who want you to back up your claims. You were even given special dispensation from the usual "credo" at OUR but failed even there to provide the support for your claims, so you tucked tail and ran away and took your "open source experimentation" to your own forum/blog where you had editorial control. But that clearly wasn't gratifying enough for you because... YOU'RE BAAACK. But you bring nothing with you except your insults and disrespect:

Hahaha - your stupidity along with MarkE's is just laughable.


You and MarkE are simply Villainous Juveniles with nothing better to do in your Lazy Retirement Days!

Laugh away, then, FALSE CLAIMANT. You cannot support your claims with data and reasoned arguments, so you insult and whine. That much is clear. It's SOP around here, you are nothing new and your life's "work" comes to nothing and will be forgotten soon.

[TinselKoala]

TK, EMark,  do you actually accept Steorn's ORBO claims, that their motor was (is) OU ??

What makes you think that I might accept those claims?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgvFHejoQEk