Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

EMJunkie · May 03, 2015, 06:51:19 PM

Quote from: MileHigh on May 03, 2015, 03:46:52 PM
In speaking to Mark in email I came to the realization that I made several mistakes. And that's all part of the process of learning.

But if you don't venture out, you don't try to come up with the answer, then you forfeit all chances to get it right and to also make mistakes. Like that you never learn.

Look at Chris as an example. He is petrified of this example because he doesn't know what to do or even how to approach the problem. Heck, he didn't even know what to discuss to start formulating an answer. Seemingly, all that he can do is spam and mock the thread.

What Chris is doing is being the real goon. He is actively stomping around on this thread and mocking and attacking the opportunity for people to actually learn something. When you think about it, it's completely crazy. An opportunity comes along to learn some basic things about real coils and real circuits, and the guy that is "inviting you to come over to his site and learn" is acting like the goon in the back of the class. He is disruptive and thinks it's "cool to act dumb and be stupid" because for him school means staring out the window during class and waiting for gym period. And of course if you are three years behind in elementary school then gym class is more fun because you are considerably bigger and stronger than everybody else.

MileHigh

WOW MileHigh admits to Ballsing this whole thing up - Entirely!!!! GOON SQUAD Admits to failure!!!

Hahahaha - Very Funny!!!

I have already given a ton more information on the POSSIBLE meanings to the POSSIBLE Circuits and terribly presented questions you have asked!!! All went un-noticed/dis-regarded, except for a "Keep going" from MileHigh, all after the actual question MileHigh asked was answered in its entirety and correctly by Myself.

Still, I sit here posting this post and think to myself, terrible Karma......

While this Circuit still is incomplete, badly presented and the King of Assumptions is still making Assumptions about this circuit and his expectations of what is being asked, I will provide some more information as to the Circuit Characteristics:

Of course, assuming MarkE's utter brilliance at 2 seconds: (? ? ?) - is refereeing to the inductor being fully charged after the 5 Time Constants:

Loop A (Which is now NOT defined in the recent Diagrams) has an Inductance value of 2H, this then has a Time Constant: 2 seconds, which now gives a Resistance Value of 1 Ohm, but now we have a Current of only 0.159 Amps? Oh no!!! What happened to our previously stated: 1 Amp? We don't have the same circuit again and something is yet again different from before!!!

Look, because this is such a shambles, MileHigh totally screwed this up from the start, now we have MarkE missing a ton of MileHigh's Information, lost definitions of prior stated Components, chop and changing things every few minutes, and really undecided on the entire set of variables.... I have to agree with Forest!!!

Quote from: forest on May 03, 2015, 03:51:36 PM

Learn what ? What is the purpose of this circuit ?

Learn What Exactly? Learn how NOT to present Circuit and Questions about it in a Public Forum!!! I tell you, Trolls Everywhere!!! Trollified Science!!!

MarkE · May 03, 2015, 07:25:09 PM

Quote from: EMJunkie on May 03, 2015, 06:51:19 PM

WOW MileHigh admits to Ballsing this whole thing up entirely!!!! GOON SQUAD Admits to failure!!!

Hahahaha - Very Funny!!!

I have already given a ton more information on the POSSIBLE meanings to the POSSIBLE Circuits and terribly presented questions you have asked!!! All went un-noticed/dis-regarded, except for a "Keep going" from MileHigh, all after the actual question MileHigh asked was answered in its entirety and correctly by Myself.

Still, I sit here posting this post and think to myself, terrible Karma......

While this Circuit still is incomplete, badly presented and the King of Assumptions is still making Assumptions about this circuit and his expectations of what is being asked, I will provide some more information as to the Circuit Characteristics:

Loop A (Which is now not defined in the recent Diagrams) has and Inductance value of 2H, this then has a Time Constant: 2 seconds, which now gives a Resistance Value of 1 Ohm, but now we have a Current of only 0.159 Amps? Oh no!!! What happened to our previously stated 1amp? We don't have the same circuit again and something is yet again different from before!!!

Wrong, but at least you tried to calculate something. The 2H inductor loop through the MOSFET does not have a 2 second time constant. The time constant is trivially determined to be many times larger. At 2.0s, the inductor current is at least 996mA and will typically be at least 997mA. It is evident that after having a couple of days to work on it, you do not know understand how the circuit operates.

Quote

Look, because this is such a shambles, MileHigh totally screwed this up from the start, now we have MarkE missing a ton of MileHigh's Information, lost definitions of prior stated Components, chop and changing things every few minutes, and really undecided on the entire set of variables.... I have to agree with Forest!!!

Learn What Exactly? Learn how NOT to present Circuit and Questions about it in a Public Forum!!! I tell you, Trolls Everywhere!!! Trollified Science!!!

EMJunkie · May 03, 2015, 07:31:42 PM

Quote from: MarkE on May 03, 2015, 07:25:09 PM
....

It is evident that after having a couple of days...

MarkE - What is evident to all, is, that you GOONs don't know what the hell you're doing, or how to ask a question about the Characteristics of an operating Circuit, with any diligence or Seriousness.

If you had something correct at the start, you may have had a little more interest in your blatant obscurity's....

Time, now, to suck up your mess and move on!

P.S: Three ? does not constitute anything of value to anyone! Try harder next time!!!

MarkE · May 03, 2015, 07:36:09 PM

What is really sad is that you claim to be showing people advances in electromagnetics but totally screwed up calculating current build-up in an inductor in a nearly ideal circuit. Would you like to try to calculate the circuit time constant and the current at 2s again? As it is you're off on the inductor current by more than 6:1 and the circuit time constant by more than 60:1.

EMJunkie · May 03, 2015, 07:41:20 PM

Quote from: MarkE on May 03, 2015, 07:36:09 PM
What is really sad is that you claim to be showing people advances in electromagnetics but totally screwed up calculating current build-up in an inductor in a nearly ideal circuit. Would you like to try to calculate the circuit time constant and the current at 2s again? As it is you're only off on the inductor current by more than 6:1.

Oh, young Skywalker, I have not changed my Circuits many hundreds of times!!! Do I know how to show you up to be a Fool MarkE, yes, all I need to do is sit back and wait, its called Karma, you and the other GOONS will do enough to prove to everyone here that you don't know what the hell you're doing!! See, right now, I am not the one with my Foot in my Mouth Again!!!