Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 135 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: Dave45 on May 09, 2015, 08:58:57 PM
MH says they dont count lol
but when freezing coils I found that without a core the A vector field ran outside the coil but if a ferrous core was added the field pulls in around the core.
Dave to have valid experiments you need to have a control that is identical but for the variable under test.  So, if you are going to freeze an energized ferromagnetic core, also freeze a an identical unenergized core.  Then repeat the experiment, switching which core you power.

If you are testing pwoered cores where one is ferrous and one is not then the one that is ferrous will have a much higher flux concentration than the non-ferrous core.

Dave45

Yes I have done both
Without a core the field is on the outside
With core the field is absent so I assume its pulled in close to the core.

MarkE

Quote from: Dave45 on May 09, 2015, 09:53:34 PM
Yes I have done both
Without a core the field is on the outside
With core the field is absent so I assume its pulled in close to the core.
For a multiple layer winding that reverses at each end there will be almost no leakage flux outside the toroid core.

Magluvin

Quote from: MarkE on May 09, 2015, 10:52:28 PM
For a multiple layer winding that reverses at each end there will be almost no leakage flux outside the toroid core.

Well, I dont know if we can call it leakage, but there is flux in the hole of the toroid core when the current is building and when the current dissipates in the winding of the toroid core.  Run a single wire through the center of the core and that wire will be induced by fluctuating field changes due to input of the toroid cores winding.

Also there would be further leakage if the core gets saturated. ;)

Mags


Dave45

Quote from: MarkE on May 09, 2015, 10:52:28 PM
For a multiple layer winding that reverses at each end there will be almost no leakage flux outside the toroid core.
Most of my experiments were done with a solenoid type coil, although I have used a toroidal winding as well but not with a core.