Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Spilled Fluids]

@Tinselkoala,

I don't have to conform to your format. Go kick one of your dogs!

Spoken like a true Jovian 1orhcnys 

[synchro1]

Spoken like a true Jovian 1orhcnys 

@Tinselkoala,

You uploaded a video of a compass needle reacting to an oscillating sine wave over a Bifilar Pancake coil. Why not try that again and see how many trombone clips it attracts as an A.C. electro-magnet?

[synchro1]

@MarkE,

Shorting the "B" coil causes an "Impulse Magnetization" event. This is mitigated by the laminated core, however not entirely! The core has it's own BH curve. Viscous remnance delays the magnet wave, and produces Lenz propulsion.

The powerful magnet field in the shorted coil that helps power the rotor at TDC is a free energy event. How ingenious! There may be a core effect that couples with it, because the field collapse deeply penetrates the core material, even though it's laminated. Don't forget, Lenz effect is still important.

There could be two forces at work in the increased power; Both the direct force from the field collapse on the rotor, and perhaps the phase shift in the reflected pole in the output coil caused by the increase in the core viscosity.

The  output coil "B" alone supplies 2/3rds of the transformers overall power after the discharging's engaged. The discharge pulse by itself should only be able to contribute %50.

[synchro1]

Perhaps just wiring a Reed switch from an output coil to a cap and diode would run a magnet rotor by itself with discharge pulsing alone?

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

Shorting the "B" coil causes an "Impulse Magnetization" event. This is mitigated by the laminated core, however not entirely! The core has it's own BH curve. Viscous remnance delays the magnet wave, and produces Lenz propulsion.

You are so off the wall that it is entertaining in a way.  Apparently unable to make any connection to your quoted passage, you have decided to drop a different load of BS.  Do you have the foggiest idea what the meaning is of even half the terms you string together? 

First, kindly find a reputable reference for "Impulse Magnetization events" that describes how such an event differs from other types of magnetization "events".

Second, kindly find a reputable reference that describes what it is about a laminated core that "mitigates" the event, and just what about the event it is that the laminated construction mitigates.

Third, explain what doesn't have its own BH curve, such that it is significant that a laminated core "has it's (sic) own BH curve".

Fourth, find a reputable reference for a "magnet wave" that describes what propagates and through what medium.

Fifth, find a reputable reference that describes "Lenz propulsion".

Sixth, find a reputable reference that asserts that "Lenz propulsion" occurs due to viscous remnance.

You will of course not be able to do these things, nor is it likely that you will even make a passing effort at trying.  We can look forward to your next vector off into a new set of bushes with yet another fresh bowl of word salad.

The powerful magnet field in the shorted coil that helps power the rotor at TDC is a free energy event. How ingenious! There may be a core effect that couples with it, because the field collapse deeply penetrates the core material, even though it's laminated. Don't forget, Lenz effect is still important.

You have yet to establish that any of these things you claim occur.

There could be two forces at work in the increased power; Both the direct force from the field collapse on the rotor, and perhaps the phase shift in the reflected pole in the output coil caused by the increase in the core viscosity.

Force is not power is not energy.

The  output coil "B" alone supplies 2/3rds of the transformers overall power after the discharging's engaged. The discharge pulse by itself should only be able to contribute %50.

Since you are making quantitative claims perhaps you would be good enough to show specifically how through measurement or calculation that you arrived at those values.