Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Some more information for you:

(Q)  In systems where conditions for expression parallel those in the solar system; is entanglement a parallel experience to entanglement in this system, so that a soul is apt only to become immersed in one of these systems, and after working out of it, be immune to the attractions of others?

(A)  No.  No two leaves of a tree are the same.  No two blades of grass are the same.  No two systems have the same awareness, neither are they parallel.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[ramset]

well
I found out why Minnie cuts down all his trees

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEaAmUDEiGo

[tinman]

Ah yes, two different points of view, for example, how one perceives oneself and the stark naked reality, they can be quite different. Delusion is eventually believing the lies, white lies, half truths we tell ourselves and others.

Your answer Vortex is much the same as most other's,where in you choose Graeme's turn of event's to be the only reality,while Helen's turn of events are a delusion. The fact is,both perceptions are correct,but only one had a positive outcome.

Like most others,you chose to believe in what would be seen as a negative outcome-a bad night,while very few have the ability to see that both outcome's are very much a reality.

1 cause-2 different effects
Action-cause of events--reaction(Graeme)--counter reaction(Helen)

[EMJunkie]

Your answer Vortex is much the same as most other's,where in you choose Graeme's turn of event's to be the only reality,while Helen's turn of events are a delusion. The fact is,both perceptions are correct,but only one had a positive outcome.

Like most others,you chose to believe in what would be seen as a negative outcome-a bad night,while very few have the ability to see that both outcome's are very much a reality.

1 cause-2 different effects
Action-cause of events--reaction(Graeme)--counter reaction(Helen)

Bump!!!

For those that do not comprehend, have not been following, but wish to comprehend and follow, to learn something and to achieve a common Goal:

Action: - (Primary Coil) - Your Input. A Magnetic Field, a result of Current Flow in your Primary Coil, that will likely have a Reactive Component. Considered as the Prime Mover.

Reaction: - (Secondary Coil) - Typically considered as a Negative result on the Action. Lenz's Law (the -), a negative result of the Secondary Coil on the Primary Coil.

Counter-Reaction: - (Secondary Coil) - Another Negative result, but this time assisting the Action, the primary, or the Action, but at the same time Countering the Reaction. Lenz's Law (the -).

The two Secondary's are what I call Partnered Output Coils!

These principals can be arranged in many configurations that may result in a working device, and the opposite is also true.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[Vortex1]

Your answer Vortex is much the same as most other's,where in you choose Graeme's turn of event's to be the only reality,while Helen's turn of events are a delusion. The fact is,both perceptions are correct,but only one had a positive outcome.

Like most others,you chose to believe in what would be seen as a negative outcome-a bad night,while very few have the ability to see that both outcome's are very much a reality.

1 cause-2 different effects
Action-cause of events--reaction(Graeme)--counter reaction(Helen)

Now sir, you are choosing to believe that I made a choice when I did not,  as I chose neither neither Helen's nor Graeme's perceptions as reality and said they were both a "point of view" of events. I never even mentioned Helen's or Graeme's name nor implied that either one was delusional. The second sentence was a non sequitur, a different idea stated for a different purpose,  unrelated to the story.

Perhaps your preconceived notions got in the way of an accurate assessment. I never implied Helen's version was a delusion, nor Graeme's. You read that into it from those notions while  the sentence that followed was referring to something quite different. Go back and read it and show me where I said Helen was delusional.

Isn't that interesting!

"The easiest person to fool is yourself" RPF

Maybe that makes the sentence I wrote about "delusion" clearer.