Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Exactly, what the fark is going on here?  Your argument is totally nonsensical.

What does the bloody pope have to do with Pi?

Pi is not some "made-made law" because we all know that "laws are made to be broken" because they are made by man and "man can't know everything."

Pi is a property of Nature.  A circle is a circle is a circle is a circle.

There are no "new circles" to be "discovered" that will "change the laws" I assure you.  Pi is an irrational number - those damn eggheads and their alleged "irrational numbers."

Like I said, alleging that the known value of Pi wrong is high comedy for the masses of anonymous readers of this forum.

Shaking Head.......

The entire extent of MileHigh's contribution - Zero! Always was and always will be!

A Fluffer, a fruit cake, a Time Waster... Seven cans short of a Six Pack!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[citfta]

Hi!Junkie!
bullshit
"These things do not work"
It's the truth...
Sorry

You sound like a broken record.

[MileHigh]

I, myself, have never tried to make a simple measurement of a circles circumference and compared it to its diameter,, I have simply run on blind faith.

I am sure that someone has done that at some time,, maybe TK could do a proper test with the correct stuff and show the results??

I  myself do not have the level of accuracy and precision that would need to be used,, or maybe patience

Simple enough test,, maybe anyway.

There are all sorts of mathematical ways and algorithms to calculate the value of Pi.  You can do it with something as simple as a table of true random numbers and get a very accurate result if the table of random numbers is large enough.

These types of debates denigrate this forum and make it look like a joke.  To argue that the value of Pi is wrong is an embarrassment to the forum and to all of the members of the forum.  We are not on the Bizarro World.

[citfta]

Here is a link to the original article by the professor that decided pi is wrong.  I am not a mathematician but the best I can understand from the article is the value is not wrong, it is the way they have to use it because it does not conform to the way they normally look at circles in the field of mathematics.  His argument (if I understand correctly) is that pi is a valid number if we are looking at circles from a degree of distance around the circumference.  But mathematicians look at circles from a radian view instead and that means they have to double pi in order to use it correctly.  You can read the article for yourself and decide what he is saying.

http://www.math.utah.edu/~palais/pi.html

If some of you would just do a little research you wouldn't have nearly as much to argue about.  Just saying.

Carroll

[seychelles]

If pi is wrong we did not go to the moon, all these other satellites that they send into
outer space  did not happen being pi is a universal constant used in a lot of formulas..