Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Lenz law is valid only for current flow. EMJunkie is right about two exact symmetrical windings which produce opposite Lenz law based currents (BEMF) in one primary. The problem is it works fine only in precise air coils. That was the first Don Smith experiments with multiple Tesla transmitters as we know...

Hi Forest,

I have looked but can not currently find the image I wanted to post, but yes you're right, Donald Smith did also use Bucking Coils.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

I've done that test with aluminum and copper, Lenz is the explanation, what causes the reduction in decent.
But it happens in a pulsating action, that is strong than , weak ,right , it is not steady , it fluxuates, correct?
Maybe the up and down speeds are due to imperfections in the surface,   of the surface the magnet is in contact with the copper or aluminum?
That will change how things flow.
It's a tough one.
artv

Hi Shylo, Electromagnetic Induction is the Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field in the proximity of a Conductor.

Typically we do see a Sinusoidal Voltage and Current produced, at least of sorts, in Electromagnetic Induction. To me, this indicates a steady change in time.

I tend to believe the Magnet falls at a steady rate but I might be wrong.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Edit: Gravity is "Constant" at around 9.8G, you can see this on your smart phone, in the compass/gyro config, I think this experiment could be done to measure the G "Constant", at different points on the Earth, with known Magnetic Field strength, Magnet Mass, Current Distribution and so on. It is an interesting experiment!

[EMJunkie]

If it is so easy it seem you have the HOLY GRAIL why don,t you reveal it to the world..I mean physically reveal the
super duper invention of yours.. Other wise it is all in
the breeze alright..

@seychelles - How's the experiment coming along? Do you have the Coils Wound yet?

This is so simple, it only takes a few minutes to get started, yet no one will do it...

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[verpies]

Flux (Φ) often means a relatively random distribution (at least as random as a Magnetic Field can be) with no real Flux uniformity for a particular Uint Area.

It would be better to say that flux density is magnetic flux per some area. B=Φ/A
The uniformity of flux does not figure into that equation.

The induction phenomena described by Lenz and Faraday depend on flux (Φ) - not on the flux density (B).

[EMJunkie]

Hey Verpies,

It would be better to say that flux density is magnetic flux per some area. B=Φ/A
The uniformity of flux does not figure into that equation.

But any core material will have a distributed Flux of Density B, and it will be uniform - Yeah? Yes I see what you mean.

The induction phenomena described by Lenz and Faraday depend on flux (Φ) - not on the flux density (B).

In a Transformer, Electromagnetic Induction occurs in the Secondary Coil without any Flux (Φ) sweeping the Secondary Coil. The Flux (Φ) is considered to be a Unit Volume in a Surface Area, which is the Cross sectional Area of the Core Material. We already know this is a quantity that has an upper limit, if you like a Maximum Density. So I guess this is a tangle of definition, or point of view as to how and what Electromagnetic Induction is really defined as today?

Induction via the Magnetic A Vector Potential.

But, Yes I see what youre saying. I automatically introduce Magnetic Flux (B) as a (B=Φ/A) term, as soon as any core material is introduced. Its my "Transformer" way of thinking.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org