Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[darediamond]

Again this is also stated many times in this thread, in this document: --->>>Guidelines to Bucking Coils. Lenz's Law Free Power Extraction<<<---, and also very clearly seen in my videos!

Both AC and Switched DC Work, each give different slightly different effects, very clearly seen on the Scope.

Like I said, and also Wistiti said, experiment will show this very clearly.

Also stated many times, the Key is the Time Rate of Change of the Flux, thus, Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction.

Please, at least read and understand the very first post to this thread before asking questions that have been repeated many hundreds of times throughout this thread: --->>>The First Post to this Thread<<<---

Like I said, all your questions have been answered already, either directly or indirectly in the material I have already provided.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Then if AC works, that is a great PLUS for all I need do is to make a new High Frequency Model Core for a new center tapped transformer and replace the one in my inverter with it.
I like back emf but the complexity of harvesting g it is high. So I would rather go for AC.
Thank you Wisiti, thank you Chris.

[darediamond]

After some 439 Pages, I hope we have now got a message of hope through to people running blindly down dark alley ways!

Induction is Induction, Electrical Energy comes directly from Matter/Mass - This is known as Mass/Energy Equivalence! It is Einstein's E = MC²

Surely the supporting evidence I have provided give's at least some people a step in the right direction:

Electrical Energy 101 - Faradays Law of Induction - Part 1
Electrical Energy 101 - Faradays Law of Induction - Part 2
Electrical Energy 101 - Faradays Law of Induction - Part 3

Electric Motors DC Motors and Generators - Part 1 - 1961 US Army Training Film
Electric Motors AC Motors and Generators - Part 2 - 1961 US Army Training Film
Electricity & Electronics - Current - 1974 US Air Force Training Film
Electricity & Electronics - Voltage - 1974 US Air Force Training Film
How Magnets Produce Electricity - 1954 US Navy Training Film

So, two equations, two ways of Inducing an EMF in a Conductor: EMF = Bvl and EMF = dPhi/dt

Here I show you some basic first principals: Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation

and, some more Principles: Opposing Magnetic Field Interactions - Partnered Output Coil

Three Coils:
   1: Input Coil
   2: Partnered Output Coils - Two Coils working together to Self Assist in the Frequency of Operation!

A good example of this is given here: Partnered Output Coils: Anti-Lenz effect - from: Юрий Лиховид (Yuri Likhovid) - Orriginally invented by Wistiti - Partnered Output Coil Toroid Feb 25, 2015

Note: There must be Current flowing in the Partnered Output Coils for this to work!

Please, always remember, Lenz's Law is a Magnetic Drag, fix the Magnetic Drag and you have got Free Energy!!! Magnetic Field is Current Flowing in the Coil Conductor.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S: When others are set in their ways, its not just their Potential that they limit, its others that listen to their advise. See with Logic and open Eyes, not through others.

Chris, is the Partnered Secondary or Output Coils the one in the picture above?

[EMJunkie]

Chris, is the Partnered Secondary or Output Coils the one in the picture above?

darediamond - Are you MileHigh using the darediamond pseudonym?


Come on, seriously!!!


Clearly you are not doing your Homework!!! You have not read and studied the information I have shared with you!


Why?


Are you deliberately trying to waste others time and ask stupid questions?

Are you deliberately trying to distract others from the topic at hand?

Are you deliberately trying to fill this thread with nonsense?

Like I said to you in the Private messages before you even posted to this thread, if you wanted to work with Partnered Output Coils, Replicate this video Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation, and send me the link to your replication!!!

This never happened!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

For other SERIOUS Researchers out there, Graham Gunderson has again shown another device that is, well, really, undeniablely measuring OU Performance!!!

No matter what the TROLLs say!!!

URL: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/20199-energy-conference-graham-gunderson.html
also some discussion here: http://overunity.com/16724/graham-gundersons-energy-conference-presentation-most-impressive-and-mysterious/msg488306/#msg488306

Gentlemen,

I was at the conference as a guest of Aaron and what Graham presented was no less than a public demonstration of a potential age changing technology and few people realized it. I thought for sure that many attendees would be chasing him down to get his autograph but it didn't happen.

Dumb me, I thought he was going to do a Part II of the complicated transformer system he demonstrated at last years conference which was important in its own right. So, I didn't plan to take photos or notes. I was hoping that he improved the COP od that system from 1.02 to maybe 1.05.

I helped him carry in his set up. Just for good luck I plugged in the solder iron and had it on standby. His system came right up with only some minor tuning required.

Graham was making his measurements using two different approaches:

1) Two Power Analyzers one on the input and one on the output

2) A Tektronix (2000) 4 channel scope with advanced math functions and probes

Both sets of instruments agreed on the values being measured. From the warm up moment the unit started at 1.53 watts in and 9.43 watts out or a initial COP of 6.16. The load was a 12V automotive lamp that operated during the entire presentation. As time went on the COP improved an hour later the input wattage was down to zero (with four places of accuracy) with the output still at 9.5. That is a COP of infinity, but lets say around 50. I was in the front row to observe this. Graham reported that he has observed the input value go negative like -.25 watts in.

I have used up all my documentation space so I can't post the one photo I took just after he shut it off.

The device takes low voltage DC in and outputs DC so COP measurements for the rest of us can probably be done with Harbor Freight DVM's - at least at with those COP values.

Graham has no idea why this thing works as well as it does. He seemed to be in a daze or sort of a tranquil state of disbelief during the conference. I suppose the rest of us might be passing out cigars and doing cart wheels.

The best part is that Graham plans to make all of this "Open Source" so that others can build and improve upon these principals. He has a web site for this material but I don't believe there is much on it at the moment. I have offered to draft any schematics he would like to post. Right now he wants to take some time off and be with his family.

He showed all the various wave forms on the presentation screen and offered his best understanding as to how it worked (but no idea as to why). The source appears to be a 12.7 A-hr lead-acid gel battery that feeds an "H bridge" chopper that then goes to a step up transformer. The peak excitation voltage is around 800 volts. The input is a single sine wave followed by 1/3 cycle of zero voltage and then repeats. This is the input to his custom conversion transformer which is composed of two large "C" Ferrite core pieces. They don't have the same properties. One has a high permittivity and the other has a lower value. The cores are beefed up with about 20 Manganese Ferrite PM's (2" x 3" x 0.5". The primary is wound on the upper core while the secondary is on the bottom. The secondary is composed of four parallel turns of about #10 AWG Litz wire in three loops. (The good stuff). The output is rectified with a synchronous diode made of Si-C FETS and a custom snubbing driving network composed of zenor diodes so that no gate resistor was used.
There is also a timing network involved to coordinate the various cycles, but no microprocessor. The output is then filtered with a large capacitor network and then drives the automotive lamp.

If the instrumentation is correct he should be able to loop the system and have a self runner, but he ran out of time. This device only became operational last Wednesday (7/6/2016). On the week end he submitted a provisional patent.

The ferrite "C" cores also have a total gap of 0.010" which is composed to two separate spacers of 5 mil Mylar sheeting.

There was no attempt to measure the temperature of the cores given the time frame.

The big problem with replication is going to be getting the high permittivity "C" cores. Graham believes that they are no longer available commercially, however if money were available (say $5K) a custom lot could be contracted for. So if you have any of they "fossils" laying around you had better hang on to them.

This is not a cheap device to build (at the moment) you will need four (4) FETS that will cost $70.00 each. I would estimate a person would be into the whole set up for around $1,500 US. But that is far cheaper than Peter's jumbo Bedini motor that he demonstrated at around $3,500. Now the price of instrumentation is a different matter.

Graham reports that he got the idea last November when he couldn't sleep. The inspiration came to him to take the components of a two year old failed experiment and move forward with it. He retrieved the box of parts from his storage van and started in. (My dates could be all wrong)

Aaron has be a great help to Graham both in the documentation and the invitation to speak. Aaron provided a set of the expensive FET's in Grahams time of need a few months ago. Aaron has probably hit the jack pot as a far as a subject goes for publishing goes. I would hope the rest of the world would take an interest in this subject and buy his books and DVD's.

So get your order in for Graham's lecture so that Aaron will fix that one up first or second.

One reason for the muted response to Graham's demonstration could be all the other great presentations. John Bedini was disclosing his work with the Royal Rife technology. Peter Lindeman was displaying a huge Bedini engine/motor. We also had Morey King and his take on the Henry Moray technology. Plus several other great speakers. I was to busy with Graham to attend all of the lectures.

There was only one young man that appeared to take a serious interest in what Graham was doing. He was taking notes and asking important technical questions. Graham offered all the technical detail this individual could copy. By rights there should have been 20 people clustered around him. Maybe there will be next year.

What I find interesting when comparing it to my own interests in the E.V. Gray technology is that there is a lot in common. To me this points to possibility of a shared fundamental physics. The Gray technology was measured to have a COP of 282 at the 7.5 kW level so maybe Grahams system could be up scaled several times and the COP improved as well. The Gray system operates using huge current pulses, Graham's system is continuous. The Gray system's main focus was repulsion force (torque) while Graham's device seems to output classical electricity (but I don't know that for sure - the lamp seemed normal enough with no exotic glows). The fundamental frequency of operation of my Gray transformer is 46 kHz. Gram's system is running at 50 kHz but he is using ferrite. Gray used common steel transformer laminations, so there is hope that the high u core can be replaced something more accessible if commonality hold true.

I suspect that the operational theory may be something like what McFreey proposed, at least the excitation of the conversion transformer has these elements in it. That is a huge magnetic pulse followed by a specific RF burst. what happens after that is any bodies guess. Graham's system follows what McFreey said how the OU is contained in a short but powerful output voltage pulse from the secondary. Who knows, but it is a place for me to start.

I have know Graham for about 10 years since we live in the same city. I'm trained as a classical EE, but I know very little compared to his knowledge of magnetics and electricity. I can barley ask descent questions when we get together. He is an excellent teacher and can sketch with the ability of a cartoonist.

I know of no other Free Energy researcher who would discover such a profound and powerful process and then give it away.

Mark McKay, PE

Please notice that this device uses Partnered Output Coils, that is, Two Sets, of, Three Coils each side.


Thanks to Reiyuki for posting Pictures, below:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[darediamond]

darediamond - Are you MileHigh using the darediamond pseudonym?


Come on, seriously!!!


Clearly you are not doing your Homework!!! You have not read and studied the information I have shared with you!


Why?


Are you deliberately trying to waste others time and ask stupid questions?

Are you deliberately trying to distract others from the topic at hand?

Are you deliberately trying to fill this thread with nonsense?

Like I said to you in the Private messages before you even posted to this thread, if you wanted to work with Partnered Output Coils, Replicate this video Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation, and send me the link to your replication!!!

This never happened!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

Chris, I am not asking stupid questions. I have power problems  I am seriously or do I say desperately looking solution for.

The question I raised are meant to clear what I do not understand even while reading your PDF manual and watching those videos of yours you directed me to AND IT NOT A SIN TO ASK FOR HELP.

I am not in to "PLAY WITH" But rather looking for permanent solution.

Up to the level of Cw and ccw winding, I understand you. But as you progress in your explanations both in the manual and elsewhere I have seen your post, I see no clarification on HOW TO TAP THE LENZLESS OUTPUT FROM THE SECONDARIES. All you keep mentioning is "Partnered Output" and "Bucking".

In Figuera Gen, CW and CW is employed and secondary output coil is clearly shown. But in your version, you make appear that the Input will also act as output which makes it a sort of Richard Willis Generator.

Few hours ago, I saw another variation which have 4 coils thus I got totally confused as to what exactly is to be followed. I was thinking maybe the 2 added coils in d diagram are the output coils and each wound in CW and CCW to before being paralleled.

That was why I asked to know what exactly is that variation for.

I do not impersonate so I remain Dare Diamond.