Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[hyiq]

Chris,

As proof of an OU device I would only consider a post that includes a video demo of how Pin and Pout was measured.

I've looked at all the videos provided from each post and not one has used a power measurement method that can be accepted as proof of OU.

However, the good news is, I have full trust in Itsu's ability to replicate to the finest details and his excellent power measurement methods.

I hope you will accept his results as they will be the only ones acceptable.

Regards

Luc

GotoLuc - What Drugs are you on??? Clearly you're here to play silly Childish Games!!! Like your brainless buddy Chet K!!!

[ramset]

Chris
Time spent here ??

yes tonnes of time ,
truly qualified claims from you

None.... not one.

and I apologize if you feel posting pics of Graham Gunderson's work above or mysterious "HP engineer" test beds
gives YOU credibility ,other peoples work and I might add work which is still not verified independently 
does not qualify as good scientific rigor on your part.

to add

not one single member not one ,whom you have claimed replicated  your "whatever it is"
has ever done a test protocol disclosure .
NOT ONE

the drug I am on

Brutal Honesty
there is no room for insults or childish antics.
I believe Brad will also release a brutally honest result here !

it is the only hope for some clarity and hopefully an end to your condescending and insulting "can't you read"
behavior to soo many really good men here.

stop acting a child and show Luc where he went wrong
besides the "baby steps for baby's" comments you have been posting.

your the one acting a child here ,not the men spending their time and biting their lips as they jump thru endless hoops for the last few years.

Please show their errors!!
sincerely
Chet k

Or I could BEG Verpies to come here and practice his "SUper Brutal Honesty" test protocol/procedures.

the slap from his ruler leaves a mark..........regardless of time spent on the "job"

[hyiq]

Chris,

As proof of an OU device I would only consider a post that includes a video demo of how Pin and Pout was measured.

I've looked at all the videos provided from each post and not one has used a power measurement method that can be accepted as proof of OU.

However, the good news is, I have full trust in Itsu's ability to replicate to the finest details and his excellent power measurement methods.

I hope you will accept his results as they will be the only one acceptable.

Regards

Luc

@All - we need to carefully analyse this post, as this post shows a very clear motive!!!




"As proof of an OU device I would only consider a post that includes a video demo of how Pin and Pout was measured." - Intent, to discredit all devices shown. Luc, being a professional Metrologist is exerting his authority, and bemeaning all others below his standard, and declaring them to be wrong - Hahaha what a joke!!!


"I've looked at all the videos provided from each post and not one has used a power measurement method that can be accepted as proof of OU." - Intent - To bemean all others work!!! GotoLuc's Common-Sense and powers of Deduction clearly do not work!!! It could be said Luc has lied in this sentence!


"However, the good news is, I have full trust in Itsu's ability to replicate to the finest details and his excellent power measurement methods." - Intent - Implying Itsu's results will be what Luc is expecting, we have already seen Luc has problems with Common-Sense...


"I hope you will accept his results as they will be the only one acceptable." - Intent - Look this says it all!!! Luc, says basically, one persons results from the other side of the Globe, will out weigh the many hundreds of results showing Positive results!!! This is the ultimate in stupidity and contradicts all there is to Science!!!


Do you, all of you out there reading see what we are up against? See the total lack of Common-Sense, the complete stupidity, the arrogance to all this, do you see why I get so frustrated with self proclaimed professionals, egotistical Fools!!!


GotoLuc, you were on my, give a second change list, now with this Ignorant Egotistical stupid rubbish that you posted, your now on my you are compromised and work for the CIA List.


I just cant believe the complete stupidity here... Egotistical Egomaniac!!!

[gotoluc]

GotoLuc - What Drugs are you on??? Clearly you're here to play silly Childish Games!!! Like your brainless buddy Chet K!!!

See, this is what happens Chris. As soon as someone doesn't agree with you then you loose it and start writing childish things then call me childish.

If you don't trust my opinion, then ask verpies for a second opinion.

and yes, even Graham Gunderson's device is not proof of OU. If it was OU, there would be no need to continuously pug it in the wall.
Also, no need for measurements when a device self sustains. That's the final test when all measurements show otherwise.
Of all knowledgeable researchers, he should know that.
So the question is, why did he not loop it?

My final test for proof of OU is a loop back to input. I would not claim OU till then.
That's what I'm going to do with the magnet torque amplifier that I'm presently working on.
I've come to the point of understanding that there's no measurement in the world that will beat that test.

Luc

[ramset]

Chris
Lighting fires under Luc to take away from the profoundly obvious point he makes
will never distract your viewers from the elephant standing behind you...

Not one example ...of test protocol which has stood up to scrutiny.

around here its called peer review , even your peers and replicators here should understand this is not
a cIA requirement.

yes imagine that
extraordinary claims require at the very least a test procedure for the claim ?

YEESH