Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Wheel vs. lever...

Started by iacob alex, September 24, 2006, 08:49:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

iacob alex


...can make us think about a facile setting side by side.

   Any design that takes into account a wheel (many spokes) or a lever(two spokes only) concept is equivalent,with a fall in gravity that follows a circular,or curvilinear track...a particular inclined plane.

   The most noticeable characteristic of gravity fall (this  "invisible flow"...) is his nonlinear development with the  time  factor:  "g" is a constant acceleration,so we can get on this inclined plane, an ever increasing velocity (kinetic energy)...if...we let it fall rather more time

  In this situation,the lever concept seems to have a certain advantage....

            All the Bests!  /  Alex

iacob alex


  ...as a concept is on the line "why make it easy,when you can make it difficult?!"

     Or more matter,less art.

                                                All the Bests!  /  Alex

iacob alex

 
   ...concept , setting side by side,becomes essential ,when we take into consideration the measurable quantity of movement,that we can get out ,due to gravity fall.

            The hub and the spokes,usually are figured as a common,rigid body that can rotate  in a single manner: with a collective angular velocity.

            The hub,adds the effort of all spokes.

            The contribution of any spoke is variable,not only owing to the momentum's arm ,but especially due to their free fall velocity.

            Here is the point: in any sequence of the process,the spokes ask for some individual angular velocities.
 
            In this way,instead of  "an army of one" effort,we have  "a nonsense stampede" stess : at any time,some moments are pushing,some moments are pulling....and their possible summ working effort, becomes smaller.

            Here we have a "to be ,or not to be " problem : before to discard any  "wheel  concept" design(more than two spokes),give them the last chance,that  of two spokes only.

                       All the Bests! / Alex

cameron sydenham

why wait for gravity when you can create it in revers, any amount. Centrifugal /centrepetal force is like gravity, only backwards/ inside out. with Cf, you can manipulate alot of variables that you cannot with gravity.

iacob alex


         Hi Cameron !

Your question up-there can get a multitude of answers...

My answer is this:if in the future we will be in a different planet(like Mars...),with no other flow(do you said rivers?),but gravity, we need to know how to take out power from this only source...

            All the Bests! / Alex